Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.751
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Unes Law Review Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP)
Benny Djaja
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Tarumanagara, Jakarta, Indonesia
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
ANALISIS YURIDIS PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP MITRA DALAM PERJANJIAN KERJA SAMA ANTARA PERUSAHAAN PENYEDIA APLIKASI MARKETPLACE (SHOPEE) DENGAN MITRA (KURIR) Opa Jermias Matara; Benny Djaja
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.684

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal relationship in the agreement between the Shopee marketplace company and its partners (courier) and to analyze the legal protection for partners in the Cooperation Agreement between the Shopee marketplace company and partners (courier). The method used in this research is normative juridical, namely the study of legal norms, both primary and secondary legal materials. The results of the study show that the legal relationship in the agreement between the Shopee marketplace company and its partner (courier) is a pseudo partnership legal relationship, namely a cooperative relationship that is not balanced with one another, meaning that the relationship is not really mutually beneficial, instead burdening the courier. and contrary to the principle of partnership. In this case, partner status is intended as a way for companies to avoid the obligation to provide wages according to the regional minimum wage (UMR). Legal protection for partners in the Partnership Cooperation Agreement between the Shopee marketplace company and the partner (courier) is to guarantee that discrepancies or errors regarding the goods ordered are not the responsibility of the courier if this is not caused by the fault or negligence of the courier, as stipulated in Article 1708 KUH Civil. Losses suffered by the courier must be reimbursed and accounted for by the seller, if the discrepancy and damage to the goods from the start is the result of the seller's mistake, while the form of legal protection for the courier in the event of a cancellation of the goods order by the consumer is the first to take the mediation route between the consumer and the courier. disputing parties, if no settlement is reached, the dispute settlement will be pursued through legal means.
Akibat Hukum dari Perjanjian yang Dibuat dengan Tanggal Mundur (Back Date) Moses Nathanael; Benny Djaja
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1087

Abstract

Back date agreement is an agreement made to accommodate past legal actions. The back date agreement is basically made based on the agreement of the parties so that it generally does not cause harm to the parties. Problems arise if this back date agreement is made in the form of an authentic deed, this is because Article 16 paragraph (1) letter m of Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning Notary Positions states that: In carrying out his position, the Notary is obliged to: read the deed before an appearance in the presence of at least 2 (two) witnesses, or 4 (four) witnesses specifically for the making of an underhand will, and signed at the same time by the appearer, witness, and Notary." The results of this study indicate that agreements made on a back date, both in the form of oral agreements, underhand deeds, and authentic deeds, basically have fulfilled the legal requirements of the agreement as referred to in Article 1320 of the Civil Code, so that it has legal.
Permasalahan dari Adanya Ketidaksesuaian Harga yang Tertera Pada Transaksi Akta Jual Beli (AJB) dengan Harga Transaksi Sesungguhnya Stanley Kurniawan; Benny Djaja
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1424

Abstract

In transferring rights to land and buildings by way of sale and purchase, the requirements for the formation of an agreement are sufficient based on the agreement between the parties and an agreement. Article 1320 of the Civil Code explains the conditions for the validity of an agreement. In the process, the transfer of land rights is carried out by prioritizing the principles of light and cash, if an agreement has a defect in the subject, the agreement can be canceled, while there is a defect in the object, it is null and void. PPAT plays an important role as an authorized official in making a Sale and Purchase Deed, in this case PPAT is responsible for the product it has made and its making must be in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. If a PPAT commits an act that is not in accordance with the applicable regulations, there are legal consequences that will become a problem in the future. The type of research used is normative. To support this research, the author uses a literature study type of research, which examines several documents related to this research. The method in this research is a normative method with a statutory approach. The research data shows how the problem of the price discrepancy in the Sale and Purchase Deed with the actual price.
Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 69/PUU-XIII/2015 terhadap Kewenangan Notaris dalam Mengesahkan Perjanjian Pasca Nikah Fara Jane; Benny Djaja; M. Sudirman Sudirman
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v5i6.5334

Abstract

Perjanjian perkawinan adalah instrumen hukum yang mengatur hak dan kewajiban suami istri selama perkawinan. Dalam hukum Indonesia, perjanjian ini awalnya hanya dapat dibuat sebelum atau saat pernikahan, sesuai Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata dan praktik notaris. Namun, Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 69/PUU-XIII/2015 menghapus batas waktu tersebut, memungkinkan pembuatan atau perubahan perjanjian selama masa perkawinan, dikenal sebagai perjanjian pasca nikah. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan studi kepustakaan dan analisis peraturan serta putusan MK. Fokusnya adalah implikasi hukum terhadap kewenangan notaris dalam membuat dan mengesahkan perjanjian pasca nikah. Hasil menunjukkan perubahan paradigma hukum signifikan, dengan kewenangan notaris yang lebih luas dan strategis. Notaris semakin memperkuat perannya sebagai pejabat umum yang memberikan kepastian dan perlindungan hukum bagi pihak-pihak dalam perjanjian. Kesimpulannya, Putusan MK ini memperluas fleksibilitas pembuatan perjanjian perkawinan dan memperkuat peran notaris dalam hukum keluarga.
Co-Authors Fara Jane M. Sudirman Sudirman Moses Nathanael Opa Jermias Matara Stanley Kurniawan