Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Humanity Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Osgar Sahim Matompo, Osgar Sahim
Dean of University of Muhammadiyah Palu
Arts Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
QUALIFYING BUSINESS COMPETITION-BASED NORMATIVE INTERPRETATION OF ARTICLE 33 CONSTITUTION 1945 REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA ABOUT THE WELFARE STATE Matompo, Osgar Sahim
Journal of Humanity Vol 5, No 1 (2017): February 2017
Publisher : Journal of Humanity

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14724/jh.v5i1.68

Abstract

The Constitution of Indonesia who set about social welfare is correlated with the normative legal basis of competition efforts. The provisions of article 33 Constitution of 1945 when associated with the concept of the welfare State showed a strength of intact over the normative basis in order to realize the welfare State Indonesia. The existence of a correlation normatifisasi with competition as a consequence of the existence of legal interpretation that developed in line with market developments. Article 33 of the Constitution of 1945 of the substantive charge republic of Indonesia who correlated with the charge that competition business competition law thereby encouraging further accomplishing the welfare state. the ideas and ideals of unification between concepts of competition business with welfare had already been thought of by the founders of the country of Indonesia. It also shows that the nation has made the concept of the welfare State as a powerful legal basis in the Constitution of Indonesia which should be realized by correlated with business competition law competition law the ratification of the business in Indonesia.
LEGAL PROTECTION OF ONLINE BUSINESS TRANSACTION (E-COMMERCE) DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC IN INDONESIA Matompo, Osgar Sahim
Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 4, No 1 (2020): Maret
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (344.239 KB) | DOI: 10.24269/ls.v4i1.2660

Abstract

In Indonesia, the electronic business (e-commerce) transaction has shown a rapid development after the application of the social distancing in the efforts to handle the spread of the coronavirus disease (Covid-19). Initially, the increase of the people?s interests to shop online was to buy masks and hand sanitizers for protection against the disease. Then, there was an increase of interest to buy stationery (as there is the trend of working and studying from home) and also medical equipment. Yet, in its application, there are many cases of where the customers experienced loss due to the use of this type of business transaction. There are legal protections on electronic transaction which have been violated during the time of the Covid-19 pandemic. These transactions are regulated on the Constitution No. 11 of 2007 regarding Information and Electronic Transaction and also Article 1365 of Burgerlijke Wetboek (BW). The stipulations of the BW Article 1365 may be applied in cases which violate the law in online business transactions (e-commerce). To fill in the legal void, there needs to be an extensive legal interpretation.
PENEGAKAN HUKUM DALAM PENGAWASAN PERSAINGAN USAHA DI INDONESIA Matompo, Osgar Sahim
Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 3, No 1 (2019): Maret
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24269/ls.v3i1.2945

Abstract

Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) merupakan salah satulembaga yang di beri mandat mengawasi praktik persaingan usaha tidak sehatoleh para pelaku usaha, penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridisnormative dan yuridis empiris. Penegakan hukum terkait dengan hukum formilterkait persaingan usaha di Indonesia seharusnya diatur secara jelas dan rigidkarena merupakan ketentuan yang bersifat memaksa sehingga perlupenyempurnaan maupun amandemen supaya tercapai kepastian hukum,Kewenangan yang diberikan oleh UU 5/1999 kepada KPPU sangat besar,namun praktik penegakan hukum persaingan usaha ditemukan bahwa banyakputusan KPPU yang dibatalkan dalam proses keberatan maupun upaya hukumkasasi yang diajukan pihak pelaku usaha tidak terlepas dari kelemahan-kelemahanyang ada dalam ketentuan UU 5/1999 itu sendiri.
Co-Authors