Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Information Technology Education Journal Jurnal Perencanaan, Sains dan Teknologi (Jupersatek)
Nur Asima
Unknown Affiliation
Aerospace Engineering Automotive Engineering Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Education Engineering Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Transportation Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Information Technology Education Journal

 1 
Comparison of Project-Based Learning and Lecture-Based Learning in Machine Learning Courses on Model Implementation Skills A. Sultan Agung; Hamzah Pagarra; Nur Asima; Nur Azizah; Nurhikma; Nurilmi Amalia Marda; Nurlisah
Information Technology Education Journal Vol. 4, No. 4, November (2025)
Publisher : Jurusan Teknik Informatika dan Komputer

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59562/intec.v4i4.11192

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of Project-Based Learning (PBL) and Lecture-Based Learning (LBL) in enhancing students’ ability to implement machine learning models. While both teaching methodologies are widely used, the impact of PBL on practical machine learning skills has not been sufficiently explored. This study investigates whether a hands-on, project-based approach leads to better performance in real-world machine learning applications compared to a traditional lecture-based approach. This experimental study involved 60 undergraduate students from a machine learning course, randomly divided into two groups: PBL and LBL. The PBL group worked on real-world machine learning projects, while the LBL group followed traditional lectures and individual assignments. Data were collected using pre- and post-test questionnaires, project performance rubrics, and observational notes. Statistical analyses were conducted to compare the two groups’ performance on machine learning tasks. The results revealed that the PBL group outperformed the LBL group in model accuracy, code quality, problem-solving, and debugging skills. The PBL group also demonstrated greater motivation and engagement, with statistically significant differences in performance (p = 0.001 for model optimization and p = 0.027 for problem-solving). The LBL group showed improvements, but the gains were less substantial. The findings suggest that PBL is more effective for developing practical skills in machine learning. However, the study's limitations include a small sample size and short duration, which may limit the generalizability of the results. This study provides novel insights into the benefits of PBL in machine learning education, offering valuable implications for curriculum design. Future research could explore long-term outcomes and the potential of hybrid teaching methods that combine PBL and LBL
Co-Authors A. Sultan Agung Hamzah Pagarra Nur Azizah Nurhikma Nurilmi Amalia Marda Nurlisah