Maulana Janah
Universitas Islam KH. Ruhiat Cipasung Tasikmalaya

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

TRANSFER KAPITAL: Studi Praktik Ulama Dalam Pengentasan Kemiskinan di Kota Tasikmalaya, Jawa Barat Maulana Janah
Jurnal Sosiologi Agama Vol. 17 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Program Studi Sosiologi Agama Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/jsa.2023.171-05

Abstract

This study is carried out to explain a capital transfer owned by Ulama in act of eradicating poverty. Religious leaders known as ulama are intelligent individuals with traits common to the pesantren. They have their own habits, which include living in an environment where Islamic ideals are ingrained. In such contexts, there is something to do with how do the ulama go about their daily lives in a society that is always changing. This study uses a qualitative method. Inductively, it is possible to deduce the research findings from the described phenomena. The data were collected systematically through observation, interviews, and recording of data sources. The data collection took place at the Al-Amin Islamic Boarding School in Tasikmalaya City. The habitus theory is used in the study framework to examine the methods of ulama to alleviate poverty. According to the study's findings, the ulama possess socioeconomic, cultural, and symbolic capital. Transferring one capital into another is possible. In the pesantren setting, community empowerment serves as the format. Additionally, the ulama amassed material wealth in the form of religious capital and other types of capital, which improved their standing in society. The process of multiplying habits with capital strength that is gathered in the social environment that allows for a process of interaction between individuals who play a role in poverty alleviation is how the clergy practice of it.
Negotiating Intra-Muslim Diversity: Social Cohesion, Cultural Negotiation, and Ahmadiyah–Non-Ahmadiyah Coexistence in Tenjowaringin, West Java Maulana Janah; Mokhamad Sukron; Mahbub Setiawan; Dadan; Faiz Husaini
Ijtimā'iyya Journal of Muslim Society Research Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): March: Ijtimā'iyya: Journal of Muslim Society Research
Publisher : Postgraduate, State Islamic University Prof. K.H. Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24090/bt60fh81

Abstract

This study examines the production of intra-Muslim social cohesion in Tenjowaringin Village, Tasikmalaya Regency, where members of Jemaat Ahmadiyah Indonesia (JAI) constitute a local demographic majority while remaining marginalized at the national and provincial levels. It investigates how residents negotiate theological boundaries, which everyday institutions sustain cooperation, and how state regulation and external mobilization shape local coexistence. This qualitative case study was conducted through multiple field visits between June 2025 and March 2026. Data were generated through face-to-face interviews with seven participants, including village officials, JAI figures, an NU cleric, a youth representative, non-JAI residents, and two women participants; field observation; and analysis of village documents. Interviews lasted approximately one hour, were recorded and documented, and were subsequently checked with key participants. The findings identify five interrelated mechanisms: the pragmatic bracketing of doctrinal disagreement; the activation of Sundanese moral idioms and gotong royong; cross-affiliation kinship; economic interdependence; and the role of religious leaders and the village government in normalizing cooperation. Cohesion in Tenjowaringin is not the absence of theological difference but an ongoing negotiated social compact. The village head estimated that approximately 3,500 of 5,362 residents were affiliated with JAI, demonstrating that majority-minority positions shift across scale: JAI is locally influential yet structurally vulnerable. The article develops negotiated cohesion as a form of hybrid solidarity that combines cultural habitus, bonding and bridging social capital, and lived religion.