Bety Wulan Sari, Bety Wulan
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 8 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : JOURNAL OF APPLIED INFORMATICS AND COMPUTING

Comparison of Light Gradient Boosting Machine, eXtreme Gradient Boosting, and CatBoost with Balancing and Hyperparameter Tuning for Hypertension Risk Prediction on Clinical Dataset Murtiningsih, Dewi Ayu; Sari, Bety Wulan; Fajri, Ika Nur
Journal of Applied Informatics and Computing Vol. 9 No. 5 (2025): October 2025
Publisher : Politeknik Negeri Batam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30871/jaic.v9i5.10400

Abstract

Hypertension is a long-lasting condition that is highly prevalent and significantly contributes to cardiovascular issues, making early identification a crucial preventive action. This research evaluates the efficacy of three boosting algorithms, eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LGBM), and CatBoost in forecasting hypertension risk. A publicly accessible dataset consisting of 4,363 samples was employed, followed by data preprocessing, feature selection through a voting method that integrates Boruta, Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE), and SelectKBest, as well as addressing class imbalance using the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) and ADASYN (Adaptive Synthetic Sampling Approach). The models were additionally fine-tuned through hyperparameter optimization using GridSearchCV and Repeated Stratified K-Fold Cross Validation. The evaluation results demonstrate that all three algorithms exhibited strong predictive capabilities, with CatBoost leading the way, achieving an accuracy of 0.992, precision of 0.992, recall of 0.992, F1-score of 0.992, and ROC-AUC of 0.9987. Analyzing the confusion matrix further validated that CatBoost had the lowest number of misclassifications when compared to XGBoost and LGBM. Additionally, the use of SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) for model interpretability highlighted that the key factors influencing the prediction of hypertension risk are blood pressure, body mass index (BMI), overall physical activity, waist circumference, triglyceride levels, age, and LDL cholesterol levels, aligning with established medical knowledge. To facilitate real-world use, the top-performing model was implemented into a user-friendly website interface, allowing users to predict their hypertension risk interactively. These findings illustrate that boosting algorithms, especially CatBoost, offer an accurate, dependable, and interpretable machine learning method for creating hypertension risk prediction systems.
Sentiment Analysis of the Film "JUMBO" on Twitter Using the Naive Bayes Method and Support Vector Machine (SVM) with a Text Mining Approach Widodo, Tegar Robi; Fajri, Ika Nur; Sari, Bety Wulan
Journal of Applied Informatics and Computing Vol. 9 No. 5 (2025): October 2025
Publisher : Politeknik Negeri Batam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30871/jaic.v9i5.10557

Abstract

This study aims to perform sentiment analysis on reviews of the film “JUMBO” collected from the Twitter platform, using the Naive Bayes and Support Vector Machine (SVM) methods. The data were gathered through a crawling process on Twitter, yielding 2,011 tweets, which were then processed through several pre-processing steps, including case folding, cleaning, normalization, tokenization, stopword removal, and stemming. Subsequently, the data were transformed into numerical representations using TF-IDF, followed by sentiment labeling into positive, negative, and neutral categories. For the Naive Bayes method, training and evaluation were conducted using 5-fold Cross Validation. The results showed that the Naive Bayes model achieved an accuracy of 80.60%, precision of 73.83%, recall of 73.50%, and an F1-score of 69.98%. Meanwhile, the SVM method obtained an accuracy of 75.87%, precision of 76.36%, recall of 62.45%, and an F1-score of 65.64%. Compared to the baseline random classifier, which only achieved an accuracy of 32.47%, both primary methods significantly outperformed it in classifying film review sentiments. The analysis also indicates that the F1-score is lower than the accuracy due to the imbalanced data distribution, with a considerably higher number of positive reviews. This study also presents visualizations of sentiment distribution and word clouds to provide a clearer understanding of audience opinions. The results demonstrate that the Naive Bayes method performs well and has potential for use in sentiment analysis of films on social media platforms. These findings are expected to provide valuable insights for the creative industry, particularly in evaluating audience responses and improving the quality of future film productions.