Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Hukum dan Demokrasi (HD) Advokasi Hukum & Demokrasi
Reni Halida Malik
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Dasar Hukum Pengajuan Peninjauan Kembali yang Dilakukan Oleh Kejaksaan Reni Halida Malik
Advokasi Hukum & Demokrasi (AHD) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): Advokasi Hukum & Demokrasi (AHD)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum (STIH) Prof Gayus Lumbuun

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61234/ahd.v1i2.37

Abstract

The development of the community's need for legal renewal has given rise to many legal phenomena that have emerged at this time. One of them is the submission of legal action for Judicial Review (PK/Heirziening) which is submitted by the prosecutor, even though so far the public sees and knows that legal action for Judicial Review (PK)/Heirziening can only be submitted by the convict, his legal advisor or his heirs. This is clearly regulated in the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Law (KUHAP) that the legal action for Judicial Review (PK)/Herziening is carried out by the convict (can also be submitted through his legal advisor) or his heirs. The legal action for Judicial Review (PK)/Herziening by prosecutors has been carried out repeatedly in Indonesia , and the Chief Justice at the Supreme Court has several times granted the prosecutor's judicial review (PK)/Herziening. The formulation and historical background of the Criminal Procedure Code is clear that PK is the right of the convict or his heirs. The PK requested by the prosecutor has so far violated the regulations legislation. The Criminal Procedure Code does not at all mention that prosecutors can apply for PK, historically PK is actually given as a last resort to the convict or his heirs to change his 'fate'.
Dasar Hukum Pengajuan Peninjauan Kembali yang Dilakukan Oleh Kejaksaan Reni Halida Malik
Jurnal Hukum dan Demokrasi (JHD) Vol 23 No 4 (2023): Hukum dan Demokrasi (HD)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Prof Gayus Lumbuun

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61234/hd.v23i4.32

Abstract

The development of the community's need for legal renewal has given rise to many legal phenomena that have emerged at this time. One of them is the submission of legal action for Judicial Review (PK/Heirziening) which is submitted by the prosecutor, even though so far the public sees and knows that legal action for Judicial Review (PK)/Heirziening can only be submitted by the convict, his legal advisor or his heirs. This is clearly regulated in the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Law (KUHAP) that the legal action for Judicial Review (PK)/Herziening is carried out by the convict (can also be submitted through his legal advisor) or his heirs. The legal action for Judicial Review (PK)/Herziening by prosecutors has been carried out repeatedly in Indonesia , and the Chief Justice at the Supreme Court has several times granted the prosecutor's judicial review (PK)/Herziening. The formulation and historical background of the Criminal Procedure Code is clear that PK is the right of the convict or his heirs. The PK requested by the prosecutor has so far violated the regulations legislation. The Criminal Procedure Code does not at all mention that prosecutors can apply for PK, historically PK is actually given as a last resort to the convict or his heirs to change his 'fate'.
Co-Authors