Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

POLEMIK TERMINOLOGI KAJIAN ISLAM ANTARA ISLAMIC APOLOGETICS DAN ISLAMIC STUDIES PERSPEKTIF MAJID DANESHGAR Farida Nur Afifah; Rini Susanti
EL-ADABI : Jurnal Studi Islam Vol 3 No 1 (2024): Juni 2024
Publisher : LPPM STAI Nida El-Adabi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59166/el-adabi.v3i1.208

Abstract

Islamic studies which are mostly carried out by Muslim academies, are apparently considered apologetic by Majid Daneshgar. According to Daneshgar, Islamic apologetics refer to a set of scholarly approaches and practices rooted in Muslim academies around the world that effectively protect Muslims from critical thinking about Islam and the koran. Through qualitative methods using literature study. This paper will analyze and criticize Daneshgar’s thinking using Jarl Manheim’s theory of the sociology of knowledge. The results of this research found two important points.  First, Daneshgar's thesis on the apologetics of Islamic studies in the Muslim academic environment cannot be separated from Majid Daneshgar's socio-historical construction.  How Daneshgar grew up in a Shiite tradition and was influenced by critical thoughts from Western scholars.  Second.  Daneshgar has overgeneralized Muslim academies.  Daneshgar only focuses on apologetic studies and ignores critical studies conducted by Muslim academies.  The most important finding from this research is that not all Western scholars' thoughts are suitable and should be adopted by Muslims.  The dominance of Western thought will make Muslims trapped in a captive mind so that Muslims lose their own originality.
REAKTUALISASI KONSEP ANAK SEBAGAI MUSUH DALAM AL-QUR’AN (STUDI ATAS QS. AT-TAGHABUN: 14) Nila Rohmatuzzahrok; Rini Susanti
Amsal Al-Qur’an: Jurnal Al-Qur’an dan Hadis Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : Yayasan Baitul Hikmah al-Zain

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63424/amsal.v1i2.64

Abstract

This article discusses the meaning of QS. at-Taghabun: 14 when compared to actual issues in Indonesia. The verses that came down in response to actual situations or issues in 7th century Arab society then came into contact with various social dynamics, cultures and traditions. Specifically, this article will explore the concept of children as enemies in the QS. at-Taghabun: 14 which is actualized in the current context in Indonesia. This paper is a type of analytical descriptive that focuses on qualitative data using the ma'na cum maghzā approach. The use of ma'na cum maghzā is expected to be able to provide a bridge to arrive at a representative meaning. The important findings in this paper consist of three important things. First, children are essentially enemies, which means children can indeed become enemies of their parents. As in cases of murder committed by children against their parents. Second, majazi enemies, namely enemies which refer to a child's actions that can prevent their parents from worshiping Allah or even a child's actions that can lead their parents to things that are prohibited by Allah. The maghzā contained in this verse is broadly based on three principles. First, the priority of enforcing and implementing Islamic Sharia. Second, be proportional and alert to ownership. Third, pay attention to the values ​​of ihsan in carrying out obligations