R. Kemala Nababan, R. Kemala
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Potensi PP KLHS Dalam Mengintegrasikan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan Dalam Penyusunan Kebijakan, Rencana, dan/atau Program Nababan, R. Kemala
Jurnal Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia Vol 3, No 2 (2017): Maret
Publisher : Indonesian Center for Environmental Law

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (215.612 KB) | DOI: 10.38011/jhli.v3i2.42

Abstract

Tulisan ini akan membahas potensi PP No. 46 Tahun 2016 tentang TataCara Penyelenggaraan Kajian Lingkungan Hidup Strategis (KLHS) dalammengintegrasikan prinsip pembangunan berkelanjutan dalam penyusunankebijakan, rencana, dan/atau program. Fokus kajian terbagi menjadi 3 aspek,yakni identifikasi elemen-elemen dalam prinsip pembangunan berkelanjutan yangterkandung dalam PP No. 46 Tahun 2016, proses pelaksanaan kajian lingkunganhidup strategis dan kritik terhadap proses tersebut, serta identifikasi keterlibatanmasyarakat dalam penyelenggaraan KLHS. Tulisan ini juga berisi beberapamasukan terhadap peraturan pelaksanaan yang diamanatkan oleh PP No. 46Tahun 2016 kepada peraturan menteri sehingga diharapkan pelaksanaan KLHSdapat berjalan secara lebih partisipatif, transparan, dan akuntabel.
Reformulation of Law Decision Bias on Restitution Payments in Sexual Violence Crimes (Comparison of Indonesia and The Netherlands) Panusunan, Panusunan; Widyawati, Anis; Sulistianingsih, Dewi; Nababan, R. Kemala
Journal of Law and Legal Reform Vol. 6 No. 3 (2025): July, 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jllr.v6i3.22109

Abstract

Sexual violence is an increasingly prevalent crime in Indonesia. Article 16 of Law Number 12 of 2022 on Criminal Acts of Sexual Violence states that, in addition to imprisonment, fines, or other criminal penalties as outlined in the Law, the judge is required to determine the amount of restitution for criminal acts of sexual violence that carry a sentence of four years in prison or more. One form of compensation available to victims of the criminal acts of sexual violence is restitution payments made by the defendant. However, many Panels of Judges still deny cases of the criminal acts of sexual violence restitution, particularly in verdicts where the defendant faces a four-year sentence or more. Several reasons explain why judges do not determine restitution payments by the defendant to the victim: the first is bias regarding the amount of compensation for victims in the judge’s decision; the second is that the request for payment restitution must be formally submitted; and the third concerns how to reformulate the determination of restitution in sexual violence cases (a comparison of Indonesia and the Netherlands).