Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Unes Law Review Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP)
Fitika Andraini
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas STIKUBANK, Semarang, Indonesia
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Perlindungan Hukum Kerugian Franchisee Akibat Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Dalam Perjanjian Waralaba Hanashobu Japanese Noodle Bar Putri Nur Annisa; Fitika Andraini
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.915

Abstract

The franchise case fulfills an unlawful act in the case of the Surabaya court decision number 837/Pdt.G/2021/Pn.Sby because the procedure is not in accordance with PP NO.42 of 2007 concerning Franchising and PERMENDAG NO. 31/M-DAG/PER/8/2008 causing losses to franchisees. In the franchise agreement there must be a franchise registration certificate, but in the hanashobu japanese noodle bar franchise agreement there is no STPW. This research is a normative research with descriptive analysis research method. Analysis of the Surabaya court decision number 837/Pdt.G/2021/Pn.Sby. The research results conclude that legal protection is given after a dispute arises or is resolved. In this case the franchisee filed a lawsuit with the Surabaya District Court to get the fairest decision. secondly, after the agreement is declared null and void, the franchisor is responsible for returning the franchisee's losses, both material and immaterial.
Penyelamatan dan Penyelesaian Kredit yang Bermasalah dalam Perjanjian Simpan Pinjam pada Koperasi (Berdasarkan Studi Putusan Nomor 15/Pdt.G/2023/Pn/Mgg) Alima Sofi A’isy; Fitika Andraini
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 4 No. 3 (2024): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (Maret - April 2024)
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v4i4.1863

Abstract

The case of a simple claim for breach of contract in the Magelang court decision number 15/Pdt.G/2023/PN Mgg was caused by the claim that the peace deed he made was legally flawed and did not have binding legal force. In the process of granting credit, it is in accordance with the 5C credit granting procedure, especially regarding collateral or guarantees, but there is a legal defect in the collateral for mortgage rights whose ownership status is owned by deceased heirs. This research uses normative juridical research with descriptive analysis research methods. Analysis of the Magelang court decision Number 15/Pdt.G/2023/PN Mgg. The results of the research concluded that rescue and settlement of problematic credit was provided after it arose and was resolved in relation to the simple lawsuit decision in the Magelang Court case by filing a simple lawsuit because a simple lawsuit was filed in a case with a material claim value of a maximum of IDR 500 million, namely: breach of contract (default); and/or unlawful acts. In this case, the cooperative filed a lawsuit with the Magelang District Court to obtain a fair decision. Once it is declared rejected in its entirety, the debtor does not compensate for the loss of the lawsuit.
Co-Authors Alima Sofi A’isy Putri Nur Annisa