Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.659
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (EAJMR) Jembatan Hukum: Kajian Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Mahkamah: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum
Santoso Budi Nursal Umar
Universitas Slamet Riyadi
Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Law Enforcement in Criminal Cases Based on Restorative Justice by the Prosecutor's Office Doris Rahmat; Santoso Budi Nursal Umar
East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research Vol. 2 No. 8 (2023): August 2023
Publisher : PT FORMOSA CENDEKIA GLOBAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55927/eajmr.v2i8.5761

Abstract

The lack of law enforcement is trapped in legal certainty and procedural justice only in carrying out law enforcement powers, ignoring substantial justice, which is the basic goal of the law itself. The purpose of this research is to find out how law enforcement in criminal cases is based on restorative justice by the prosecutor's office. This research method uses the type of normative legal research defined as a research method on statutory rules. The nature of this research is descriptive because it describes systematically positive laws and principles or theories related to restorative justice. The results of this study show that the enforcement of criminal acts based on Restorative Justice by the prosecutor's office is carried out based on the Attorney General's Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 15 of 2020 concerning Termination of Prosecution Based on Restorative Justice. The public prosecutor can terminate the prosecution in the public interest.
Legislative Oversight from the Perspective of Checks and Balances : A Study of the Sragen Regency Regional People's Representative Council Santoso Budi Nursal Umar; FX. Hastowo Broto Laksito; Erin Franchesca
Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026): September: Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/jembatan.v3i3.3416

Abstract

This study analyzes the normative construction of the supervisory function of the Regional People's Representative Council (DPRD) over regional heads from the perspective of checks and balances and formulates a strengthening model for the supervisory function of the Sragen Regency DPRD. The research employs normative legal research using statutory and conceptual approaches, strengthened by document based confirmation through DPRD performance reports, minutes of meetings, documents concerning the Regional Head Accountability Report (LKPJ), accountability for the Regional Revenue and Expenditure Budget (APBD), commission and Budget Committee reports, recess reports, and Audit Board of Indonesia (BPK) examination reports. The findings show that the DPRD has a substantial normative supervisory framework through its oversight and budgeting functions, the rights of interpellation, inquiry, and expression of opinion, the review of the LKPJ, and follow up to public finance audits. In Sragen Regency, documentary materials show a functioning institutional architecture involving special committees, faction views, commission reviews, budget accountability, recess aspirations, DPRD recommendations, and BPK findings. Strengthening oversight therefore does not principally require additional powers, but rather improved quality, objectivity, transparency, and continuity of follow up. An ideal model links data, evaluation, recommendations, follow up, and renewed oversight in a continuous cycle so that the DPRD regional head relationship remains balanced and supports accountable, transparent, and responsive regional governance.
Legal Consequences of Cancellation of the Land Sale and Purchase Agreement by the Seller Consequences of Buyer Defaulting Santoso Budi Nursal Umar; Doris Rahmat
Mahkamah : Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): January : Mahkamah : Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/mahkamah.v2i1.365

Abstract

This research aims to determine the process of canceling a land sale and purchase by the seller because the buyer defaulted, the legal consequences of canceling the land sale and purchase agreement by the seller because the buyer defaulted. The research method used in this research is descriptive analytical. The research results of the sale and purchase agreement process are valid and have binding force since an agreement is reached between the seller and the buyer. The sale and purchase agreement is based on the validity of the contract and other agreement principles. An agreement can be null and void (van rechtswege neiting) or can be canceled (vernietigbaar), if an agreement does not meet the requirements specified in accordance with Article 1320 of the Civil Code, namely if it does not fulfill subjective requirements (they agree to bind themselves, are competent to make an agreement) and objective conditions (a certain thing, a lawful cause). The legal consequences that arise for the buyer if they default, the buyer is required to pay compensation for losses suffered by the seller, pay court costs if sued in court, and fulfill the agreement if it continues.
Co-Authors Erin Franchesca FX Hastowo Broto Laksito Rahmat, Doris