Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

The Effect of Principal Leadership and Work Discipline on Job Satisfaction of Public High School Teachers Rizky Dwi Utami; Al Hadi Yan Putra; Heri Setyo Nugroh
International Journal of Education and Literature Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): August : International Journal of Education and Literature
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/ijel.v2i2.77

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of principal leadership and teacher work discipline on teacher job satisfaction at SMA Negeri in Talang Ubi sub-district. The sample size taken was 57 teachers at SMA Negeri in Talang Ubi sub-district. The sampling technique with purposive sampling is where the respondents taken are some teachers at SMA Negeri in Talang Ubi sub-district. Data collection was carried out by distributing questionnaires that used a 5-point Likert scale to measure 75 statement items. The analysis technique used is multiple linear regression analysis. The results showed that there was an influence of Principal Leadership and Teacher Work Discipline on Job Satisfaction Second, there was an influence of Principal Leadership on Job Satisfaction. Third, there is the influence of Teacher Work Discipline on Job Satisfaction
ANALISIS YURIDIS PENEGAKAN HUKUM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DALAM PENJATUHAN VONIS HAKIM Utami, Rizky Dwi; Saputra, M Adi
Bahasa Indonesia Vol 2 No 1 (2024): JURNAL LEX SUPERIOR
Publisher : Universitas Kader Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54816/jls.v2i1.712

Abstract

The judge's consideration is one of the most important points in realizing the value of a judge's decision which contains justice (ex aequo et bono) and contains legal certainty, of course it is also beneficial for the parties concerned. However, sometimes it is felt that the judge's decision in corruption decisions has not touched the legal objective. Therefore, the author wants to know about law enforcement in the consideration of judges in imposing a decision (Decision Study Number: 01/Pid.Sus.TPK/2017/PN.Mdn). The writing of this research uses the normative juridical research method, which is a method used to review/analyze data in the form of legal materials, especially primary legal materials and secondary legal materials related to the material discussed. Based on the results of the analysis, it can be concluded that the basic considerations of judges in imposing a decision are based on juridical considerations and non-juridical considerations. Where this is the District Court in determining judex facti, with the authority to examine the facts and evidence of a case. While the factors of law enforcement of corruption in the imposition of judges' verdicts (Decision Study Number: 01/Pid.Sus.TPK/2017/PN.Mdn) can be determined from 5 factors namely, Legal Factors, Law Enforcement Factors, Facilities and Infrastructure Factors, Community Factors and Cultural Factors. Where from the judge's verdict can analyze law enforcement.
Analisis Yuridis Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Penjatuhan Vonis Hakim (Studi Putusan Nomor : 01/Pid.Sus.TPK/2017/PN.Mdn) Utami, Rizky Dwi; Saputra , M. Adi
Winter Journal: IMWI Student Research Journal Vol. 4 No. 2 (2023): Winter Journal: IMWI Student Research Journal
Publisher : Institut Manajemen Wiyata Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52851/wt.v4i2.43

Abstract

Pertimbangan Hakim merupakan salah satu poin terpenting dalam mewujudkan nilai dari suatu putusan hakim yang mengandung keadilan (ex aequo et bono) dan mengandung kepastian hukum, tentu juga bermanfaat bagi para pihak yang bersangkutan. Namun terkadang putusan hakim dalam putusan korupsi dirasa belum menyentuh tujuan hukum. Oleh sebab itu, penulis ingin mengetahui mengenai penegakan hukum dalam pertimbangan hakim dalam menjatuhkan sebuah putusan (Studi Putusan Nomor: 01/Pid.Sus.TPK/2017/PN.Mdn). Penulisan penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif yaitu suatu metode yang digunakan untuk mengkaji/menganalisis data yang berupa bahan-bahan hukum terutama bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder yang berkaitan dengan materi yang dibahas. Berdasarkan hasil analisis, dapat disimpulkan bahwa Dasar pertimbangan hakim dalam menjatuhkan sebuah putusan adalah berdasarkan pertimbangan secara yuridis dan pertimbangan secara non yuridis. Dimana hal ini Pengadilan Negeri dalam menentukan judex facti, dengan yang berwenang memeriksafakta dan bukti dari suatu perkara tersebut. Sedangkan faktor?faktor penegakan hukum tindak pidana korupsi dalam penjatuhan vonis hakim (Studi Putusan Nomor : 01/Pid.Sus.TPK/2017/PN.Mdn) dapat ditentukan dari 5 faktor yaitu, Faktor Hukum, Faktor Penegak Hukum, Faktor Sarana dan Prasarana, Faktor Masyarakat dan Faktor Kebudayaan. Dimana dari vonis hakim tersebut dapat menganalisis penegakan hukum.