Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Litigasi Amsir
Nasrul Nasrul
Fakultas Hukum Institut Ilmu Sosial dan Bisnis Andi Sapada
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Kajian Yuridis Tanda Tangan Elektronik Sebagai Alat Bukti yang Sah dalam Perspektif Hukum Acara Perdata Nasrul Nasrul
Jurnal Litigasi Amsir Vol 10 No 4 (2023): Agustus
Publisher : Faculty of Law Andi Sapada Institute of Social Sciences and Business

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The aim of this research is to determine the position and legal strength of electronic signatures as evidence. And to find out the resolution of civil disputes submitted by the parties using electronic document evidence signed with an electronic signature. The type of research used is Normative Juridical. The research results show that the recognition and legal force of electronic signatures as electronic documents in Indonesian evidentiary law is recognized for its essence after being regulated in the applicable laws and regulations. The resolution of civil disputes submitted by the parties using electronic document evidence signed with an electronic signature to resolve disputes resulting from non-fulfillment of agreements agreed upon by the electronic transaction actors, can be resolved through a lawsuit to the court, or through non-litigation institutions such as arbitration. , mediation, negotiation, in accordance with the agreement for resolving disputes due to non-fulfillment of the achievements agreed upon by both parties, in general resolving disputes regarding violations of the agreement, electronic transaction actors prefer to resolve disputes through non-litigation, because it is relatively cheaper, and the cost is not too expensive.
Melampaui Retribusi: Restorative Justice untuk Pemulihan Aset Negara dari Korupsi Andi Fahrul; Nasrul Nasrul; Firmansyah Hibbu; Phireri Phireri; Herman B
Jurnal Litigasi Amsir Vol 13 No 2 (2026): Februari
Publisher : Faculty of Law Andi Sapada Institute of Social Sciences and Business

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to determine and analyze the significance of the application of the concept of restorative justice in corruption cases and the model for applying the concept of restorative justice in corruption cases. This research uses a normative empirical research method with a legal and social approach. Primary and secondary data sources are used. Data analysis will be conducted using observational-sensory and theoretical-rational methods, employing a reasoning model that first utilizes inductive logic and then continues with deductive logic. The results of this study are The significance of restorative justice is its potential to recover state losses and create more substantive accountability, but it can only be applied to certain corruption cases that meet strict requirements, such as small losses and no wide impact, so as not to erode the deterrent effect and substantive justice, The retributive justice paradigm which is the legal basis for eradicating corruption is not relevant to the main objective of corruption eradication law in Indonesia. The spirit to save state assets must be based on restorative justice thinking that is oriented towards recovery from the consequences of corruption rather than focusing on imprisoning perpetrators of corruption and The concept of restorative justice in the punishment of perpetrators of corruption can be implemented in the form of strengthening the norms of returning state losses from additional punishment to the main punishment and The model for implementing the restorative justice concept in corruption cases must be supported by strong regulations and strict oversight to ensure the goal of recovering state losses is achieved without sacrificing the principle of justice. Therefore, the model for implementing restorative justice at the police level is based on Police Regulation No. 08 of 2021 concerning Handling Criminal Acts Based on Restorative Justice. Restorative justice is an effort hoped for by the public who desire reparation for losses suffered as a result of criminal acts. Public participation in resolving cases using a restorative justice approach can also increase public awareness of the law, thus also serving to prevent crime.
Co-Authors Andi Fahrul Firmansyah Hibbu Herman B Phireri Phireri