Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA (JPPIPA)
Ni Wayan Diah Purnami Dewi M
Ayah Kandung
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Education Materials Science & Nanotechnology Physics

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
The Effect of Verification Experimental Methods on Science Process Skills and Chemistry Learning Achievement Ni Wayan Diah Purnami Dewi M; I Wayan Subagia; I Wayan Redhana
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA Vol 9 No 7 (2023): July
Publisher : Postgraduate, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jppipa.v9i7.4373

Abstract

Learning by using the verification experimental methods could improve students' cognitive abilities and science process skills. However, there are inconsistent results when applying this method of science process skills and learning achievement. This study was conducted to describe and explain: the simultaneous differences in science process skills and learning achievement between students taught by verification experimental and conventional methods; the differences in student science process skills taught by verification experimental and conventional methods; and the differences in the students’ learning achievement taught by the verification experimental and conventional learning methods. This study was a quasi-experiment with a pretest-posttest design. The data analysis was conducted using descriptive analysis techniques and multivariate analysis (MANCOVA). The results of the study showed there are simultaneous differences in science process skills and students' learning achievement with an r square price of 0.743, or 74.3%; there are differences in the science process skills of students who studied using the verification experimental methods; and there are differences in students’ learning achievement; the experimental class was is higher than the control class. The other inconsistent results of the study on this method were caused by the different characteristics and cognitive levels of students
Co-Authors I Wayan Redhana I Wayan Subagia