Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Aksi Kita: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Keadilan
Muhammad Hizbullah
Universitas Muslim Nusantara Al-Washliyah
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Legal Argumentation for The Resolution of Joint Property Dispute Through Decisions of The Supreme Court of The Republic of Indonesia From a Justice Perspective Muhammad Hizbullah; Zein Achyar; MHd Yadi Harahap
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i2.6321

Abstract

Based on the Supreme Court’s annual reports from 2021 to 2023, there has been a significant increase in cassation-level cases involving joint property disputes. The number rose from 156 cases in 2021 (including remaining cases from 2020) to 167 in 2022, and further to 238 in 2023. This upward trend indicates growing dissatisfaction with the resolution of joint property cases in terms of justice and benefit for the disputing parties. This research aims to analyze the legal argumentation in resolving joint property disputes at the cassation level from a justice perspective, focusing on two Supreme Court decisions: Number 78/K/AK/2021 and Number 298/K/AK/2022. These decisions reveal contrasting interpretations of justice. In case 78/K/AK/2021, the division was 70% to the wife and 30% to the husband, differing from Article 97 of the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI), which mandates equal distribution. Conversely, case 298/K/AK/2022 upheld a 50:50 division. The study uses a qualitative method with a normative juridical approach, analyzing Supreme Court jurisprudence, relevant positive law, and statutory provisions. Joint property division in Indonesia is governed by the Civil Code, Law No. 1 of 1974, customary law, and KHI, with varying approaches based on legal traditions and societal values. The findings suggest that legal interpretations should consider philosophical, juridical, and social dimensions. Therefore, justice in joint property division may require flexible proportions (e.g., 70:30), rather than a rigid 50:50 split, to reflect each party’s actual contributions and to uphold fairness and benefit for all parties involved.
Sosialisasi Peran dan Fungsi Notaris di Masyarakat Desa Sukorejo Kecamatan Sai Balai Kabupaten  Batubara Yeltriana Yeltriana; Ismed Batubara; Muhammad Hizbullah
Aksi Kita: Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): MARET-APRIL
Publisher : Indo Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63822/azgx7526

Abstract

Notaris memiliki peran penting dalam memberikan kepastian hukum melalui pembuatan akta autentik serta pelayanan hukum lainnya, seperti konsultasi dan lain-lain  kepada masyarakat. Namun, masih banyak masyarakat desa yang belum memahami peran dan fungsi notaris secara menyeluruh. Kegiatan sosialisasi ini bertujuan meningkatkan pemahaman masyarakat Desa Sukorejo, Kecamatan Sei Balai, Kabupaten Batu Bara mengenai peran, fungsi, kewenangan, serta manfaat penggunaan jasa notaris dalam berbagai transaksi hukum. Metode yang digunakan meliputi penyuluhan, diskusi, dan sesi tanya jawab. Hasil kegiatan menunjukkan adanya peningkatan pemahaman masyarakat terhadap pentingnya notaris dalam menjamin legalitas dokumen dan perlindungan hukum. 
ANALYSIS OF CRIMINAL LIABILITY OF THE HEAD OF THE MARKETING SECTION AT BANK SUMUT WHO COMMITTED CORRUPTION IN THE DECISION OF THE MEDAN DISTRICT COURT NUMBER 67/PID.SUS-TPK/2025/PN MDN Amran Effendi Dalimunthe; Muhammad Hizbullah
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 1 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : CV. Barokah Publsiher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Based on the results of the study, it shows that the application of the elements of criminal acts of corruption in providing credit that does not comply with Banking Standard Operating Procedures in the Medan District Court Decision Number 67 / Pid.Sus-TPK / 2025 / PN Mdn is appropriate because the panel of judges has stated that the charges of Article 3 of Law No. 31 of 1999 have been fulfilled based on written evidence, witness testimony evidence, and the defendant's statement. The form of unlawful acts committed by the Head of the Marketing Section so that it is qualified as a criminal act of corruption in Decision Number 67 is the defendant's actions in not carrying out the credit analysis process in accordance with applicable provisions, approving applications for 2 credit facilities with incorrect data. The defendant's punishment is imprisonment for 1 year and 4 months and a fine of Rp. 50,000,000.
Co-Authors Amran Effendi Dalimunthe Ismed Batubara Mhd Yadi Harahap Yeltriana Zein Achyar