رحمت تولایی, رحمت
دانشگاه قرآن و حدیث قم پردیس تهران

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

Criterion for “Anti-Shī‘a Approach”, Rulings and Effects Governed over the Anti-Shī‘as in ImāmÄ« Jurisprudence تولایی, رحمت; نقیبی, سید ابوالقاسم
فقه و اصول سال. Û´Û¹, شماره. Û±: شماره پیاپی Û±Ã
Publisher : انتشارات دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22067/fiqh.v0i0.45647

Abstract

There are five views concerning the criterion for the anti-Shī‘a (nāṣibī) in the jurisprudential literature of the Imāmī jurists. These views include 1. Prioritizing non-Ali to Ali (A.S.); 2. Showing enmity toward followers (shī‘as) of Ali; 3. Absolute enmity to Ahl al-Bayt (A.S.); 4. Expressing enmity to Ahl al-Bayt (A.S.); 5. Religious devotedness to enmity toward Ahl al-Bayt (A.S.). By careful consideration of the evidences referred to in this writing, we would find out that the criterion for presuming any person as anti-shī‘a, is their expression of enmity toward the Ahl al-Bayt (A.S.) and religious devotedness toward it. Although from the viewpoint of the renowned majority of the jurists many rulings such as unbelief (kufr), ritual impurity (nijāsa), etc. is directed toward nāṣibīs, despite the possibility of their will to unbelief vs. belief in traditions, they cannot be considered as unbelievers (kāfir) in its connotative meaning (unbelief vs. Islam); also, what is meant by ritual impurity of the nāṣibīs is their innate malice.