Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal SALAM: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i Ius Humani. Law Journal
Yevhen Leheza
University of Customs & Finance
Religion Arts Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Features of understanding public relations in Ukraine and European countries Yevhen Leheza; Serhii Herasymchuk; Olena Banchuk-Petrosova; Vyacheslav Tylchyk; Volodymyr Rohalskyi
Ius Humani. Jornal do direito Vol 12 No 1 (2023): Ius Humani. Law Journal
Publisher : Universidad Hemisferios

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31207/ih.v12i1.319

Abstract

The purpose of the research is defining the concept of social relations from the point of view of theoretical, administrative, civil-legal aspects of legal regulation, considering scientists. Main content. The content of the concepts of “public relations” and “social relations” as political and legal entities with different paradigmatic definitiveness is substantiated. Methodology: The methodological basis of the research consists of comparative-legal and system analysis, formal-legal method, interpretation method, hermeneutic and methods of analysis and synthesis. Conclusions. It has been established that the term “public relations” characterizes relations between people, which provide for the unconditional priority of the economy over other spheres of society (political, ideological, cultural), where there is no place for a person with his values, rights and freedoms. At least, the latter do not acquire proper regulatory support.
International Perspectives on the Legal Framework Governing Prosecutorial Activities Yevhen Leheza; Oleksii Kalchuk
SALAM: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i Vol. 12 No. 2 (2025): Summer Edition
Publisher : SALAM: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/sjsbs.v12i2.46140

Abstract

This article seeks to illuminate how prosecutors' offices are legally regulated internationally. Through a comparative analysis of various foreign prosecutors' offices, the study presents information regarding their position within the government, the models they utilise, and their core functions. This allows for understanding the role and evolution of prosecutors' offices in prominent countries today. Germany, for instance, has public prosecutors' offices operating within all levels of its general court system. The Federal Prosecutor General operates under the general oversight of the German Minister of Justice. Meanwhile, the French prosecutor's office is considered part of the executive branch and is subject to the authority of the Ministry of Justice. French prosecutors share a close relationship with the judiciary, undergoing similar training and often transitioning between roles as prosecutors and judges. Latvian law designates the prosecutor's office as a judicial body. This office independently oversees adherence to the law within its defined jurisdiction. The United Kingdom has no specific "public prosecutor's office" or equivalent.Keywords: prosecutor's Office; Organisation of the prosecutor's office; Models of foreign prosecutor’s Offices; Positioning of the Prosecutor's Office; Powers of Foreign Prosecutors
Co-Authors Oleksii Kalchuk Olena Banchuk-Petrosova Serhii Herasymchuk Volodymyr Rohalskyi Vyacheslav Tylchyk