Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

PELAKSANAAN PEMILIHAN UMUM KEPALA DAERAH DI DAERAH YANGBERKARAKTERISTIK KEPULAUAN (Studi Kasus Pemilihan Umum Kepala Daerah Di Provinsi Maluku) Julista Mustamu
UNES Journal of Swara Justisia Vol 3 No 1 (2019): UNES Journal of Swara Justisia (April 2019)
Publisher : Program Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Maintaining the holding of regional head elections (post-conflict local elections)inregional areas that are characterized by islands in Indonesia that are in accordance withthe characteristics of the island community is in the context of realizing fair and beneficialpost-conflict local election implementation for the community, to further improve welfareand adapted to the development of the island community. In Law No. 1 of 2015 concerningDetermination of Government Regulations in lieu of Law No. 1 of 2014 concerning theElection of Governors, Regents, and Mayors not being able to accommodate theostconflict local election that is in favor of the regions characterized by islands. Therefore,in the implementation of post-conflict local election in the islands, there are still variousproblems related to the implementation of post-conflict local elections. Thus, legalarrangements are needed that favor the regions that are characterized by islands. Wherethe government is obliged to treat the people of the island province in a different way fromother provinces, considering the sea has special characteristics that are different from theland. The research method used is normative legal research. The problem examined is howis the implementation of general elections in regional areas characterized by islands,especially in Maluku province? The results of this study are that in organizing generalelections in areas characterized by islands, especially in Maluku province, there are stillseveral problems. As related to the involvement of police officers and the State CivilApparatus (ASN), weak supervision, and the obstruction of the distribution of ballots, andthe delay in the results of recapitulation of election results. This is because MalukuProvince is an island characterized by islands, where there are many small islands thatare difficult to reach either by the executor or the election supervisor. Although at the timeof voting it was generally safe and conducive.
Implementation Of Central And Regional Financial Relations Policy On Regional Expenditure Management Steven Howard Watumlawar; Julista Mustamu; Erick Stenly Holle
International Journal Of Economics Social And Technology Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): June, 2026
Publisher : Lembaga Riset Ilmiah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59086/ijest.v5i2.2151

Abstract

The implementation of Law Number 1 of 2022 on Financial Relations between the Central Government and Regional Governments (HKPD Law) is expected to improve the quality of regional expenditure through stronger fiscal discipline and more efficient budget allocation. However, many local governments continue to face challenges in complying with the expenditure composition mandated by the law. This study examines the implementation of the HKPD Law in regional expenditure management in Tanimbar Islands Regency and identifies the factors influencing its implementation. An empirical legal approach was employed using interviews, questionnaires, and document analysis involving 33 respondents from the regional government, DPRD Budget Committee, BPKAD, and BAPPEDA. The findings reveal that the implementation of the HKPD Law has not been fully effective, as personnel expenditure continues to exceed the statutory threshold, thereby limiting infrastructure expenditure despite administrative compliance with mandatory spending in the education and health sectors. The study further identifies fiscal dependency on central transfers, limited technical capacity of financial management personnel, and the geographical characteristics of an archipelagic region as the principal barriers, while regulatory clarity and the utilization of the Regional Government Information System (SIPD) serve as important enabling factors. The novelty of this study lies in integrating juridical compliance analysis with empirical evaluation of regional expenditure management under the HKPD framework in a fiscally dependent archipelagic region. The findings contribute to the literature on fiscal decentralization and provide practical insights for strengthening regional fiscal governance through expenditure restructuring, institutional capacity enhancement, and improved implementation of the HKPD policy.
Kewenangan Pembatalan Peraturan Daerah Provinsi dalam Sistem Hubungan Pusat dan Daerah Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Apriando Darisa Limba; Julista Mustamu; Andress Deny Bakarbessy
Jurnal Locus Penelitian dan Pengabdian Vol. 5 No. 8 (2026): JURNAL LOCUS: Penelitian dan Pengabdian
Publisher : Riviera Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58344/locus.v5i8.6193

Abstract

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 137/PUU-XIII/2015 dan Nomor 56/PUU-XIV/2016 mengubah fundamental mekanisme pengawasan Peraturan Daerah (Perda) dengan mencabut kewenangan eksekutif membatalkan Perda sepihak dan mengalihkannya ke ranah yudisial di Mahkamah Agung, menimbulkan konsekuensi hukum kompleks terkait efektivitas pengawasan produk hukum daerah dalam kerangka NKRI. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis dasar kewenangan pembatalan Perda Provinsi pasca-putusan MK serta implikasi hukumnya terhadap pengawasan hubungan pusat-daerah. Penelitian hukum normatif ini menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan kasus, dengan bahan hukum primer (UUD NRI 1945, UU No. 23 Tahun 2014, Putusan MK No. 137/PUU-XIII/2015 dan No. 56/PUU-XIV/2016), sekunder, dan tersier, dianalisis kualitatif-preskriptif melalui interpretasi gramatikal, sistematis, dan teleologis. Hasil menunjukkan Putusan MK menggeser dasar kewenangan pembatalan Perda dari executive review ke judicial review berdasarkan Pasal 24A ayat (1) UUD NRI 1945, menurunkan efektivitas pengawasan produk hukum daerah secara signifikan. Hilangnya instrumen represif eksekutif cepat menyebabkan institutional overload pada pengawasan preventif (executive preview) di pusat, serta kemandulan fungsi Gubernur sebagai Wakil Pemerintah Pusat (GWPP) mengawal regulasi daerah, khususnya wilayah kepulauan seperti Maluku. Infrastruktur hukum acara Mahkamah Agung berdasarkan PERMA No. 1 Tahun 2011 pun belum siap karena lambat, tertutup (chamber system), dan formalistik-legalistik tanpa mekanisme putusan sela (interim order), menciptakan kekosongan instrumen kendali tengah responsif yang berpotensi menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum (rechtsonzekerheid) berkepanjangan bagi masyarakat sipil dan pelaku usaha selama litigasi. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan reformasi hukum acara Mahkamah Agung melalui revisi PERMA No. 1 Tahun 2011, penguatan kapasitas kelembagaan pengawasan preventif, revitalisasi.
Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Musyawarah Perencanaan Pembangunan (Musrenbang) Kecamatan Leti Kabupaten Maluku Barat Daya Endya Fabrizia Katipana; Julista Mustamu; Sherlock Halmes Lekipiouw
Jurnal Locus Penelitian dan Pengabdian Vol. 5 No. 8 (2026): JURNAL LOCUS: Penelitian dan Pengabdian
Publisher : Riviera Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58344/locus.v5i8.6339

Abstract

Partisipasi masyarakat dalam perencanaan pembangunan daerah melalui Musyawarah Perencanaan Pembangunan (Musrenbang) merupakan instrumen penting untuk mewujudkan perencanaan yang demokratis, transparan, dan responsif terhadap kebutuhan masyarakat. Di Kecamatan Leti, Kabupaten Maluku Barat Daya, terdapat persoalan mengenai keterlibatan masyarakat serta keterhubungan antara aspirasi masyarakat dengan penetapan prioritas pembangunan. Penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual ini bertujuan menganalisis pengaturan dan kedudukan hukum partisipasi masyarakat dalam Musrenbang serta akibat hukum ketiadaannya. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa partisipasi masyarakat memiliki dasar hukum yang kuat, yaitu UU No. 25/2004, UU No. 23/2014, dan Perda Kabupaten MBD No. 10/2021. Masyarakat berkedudukan bukan hanya sebagai penerima manfaat, tetapi sebagai subjek yang berhak menyampaikan aspirasi dan terlibat dalam penetapan prioritas. Namun, forum Musrenbang belum menjamin partisipasi substantif, terutama dalam tindak lanjut aspirasi. Musrenbang tanpa partisipasi berpotensi mengalami cacat prosedural, meskipun tidak setiap usulan yang tidak terealisasi merupakan pelanggaran hukum jika proses penetapan prioritas tetap transparan, akuntabel, dan partisipatif. Penguatan partisipasi substantif memerlukan informasi terbuka, peningkatan kapasitas masyarakat, dan mekanisme umpan balik yang jelas.