Suherman Suherman
Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jakarta

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Legal Protection of Netflix’s Digital Content Copyright Against Illegal Account Sharing Practices in Indonesia Murtanti Fajarrani Devi; Suherman Suherman
Jurnal Daulat Hukum Vol 8, No 4 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/jdh.v8i4.49047

Abstract

The expansion of digital streaming services has reshaped how Indonesian audiences obtain entertainment, with platforms operating through Over-The-Top (OTT) distribution such as Netflix becoming central to daily media use. Alongside the economic opportunities created for the digital creative sector, this shift has also produced legal complications, especially regarding the protection of works that are made available exclusively in digital formats. A recurring concern involves the circulation of Netflix accounts that are exchanged, sold, or jointly used in ways that exceed the scope of legitimate subscription rights. Such practices allow individuals to enjoy paid content without holding their own access authorization, thereby interfering with the economic rights legally reserved for Netflix as the copyright owner. Although a number of scholars explore copyright enforcement in online environments, discussions focused on the legal treatment of account-sharing within Indonesia remain scarce. To address this issue, the present study examines how the protection of Netflix’s digital content is framed under Indonesia’s Copyright Law (Law No. 28 of 2014) and identifies doctrinal uncertainties as well as sociological factors that complicate enforcement efforts. The research is conducted through a normative methodology supported by statutory and conceptual approaches, utilizing legislation, academic commentary, and other relevant legal materials. The analysis shows that unauthorized sharing of subscription accounts contradicts the rights to distribute and communicate a work to the public, as provided in Article 9 of the Copyright Law. However, because the law does not explicitly regulate the sharing of paid digital accounts and public understanding of digital copyright obligations remains limited, a regulatory gap persists. The study therefore argues that improving the protection of copyrighted digital works requires clearer legislative direction, cooperation among state institutions, and broader public education on digital copyright norms to ensure that creators’ economic interests are adequately safeguarded and that Indonesia’s creative economy can continue to grow in a sustainable manner.
Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Konsumen Atas Produk Bersertifikat Halal Yang Mengandung Unsur Tidak Halal Joy Catherine Carina Tambunan; Suherman Suherman
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 8 No. 3 (2025): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v8i3.12994

Abstract

This study aims to examine the legal liability of business actors and the Halal Product Supervisory Agency (BPJPH) for halal-certified products proven to contain non-halal elements, as well as to analyze legal protection for consumers who are harmed. The background of the study is based on the discovery of seven halal-certified products containing porcine elements, which demonstrates the urgency of evaluating the effectiveness of the implementation of three main regulatory pillars (the Consumer Protection Law, the Halal Product Guarantee Law, and Government Regulation No. 42 of 2024) in ensuring legal protection for Muslim consumers. This study uses a normative legal method with a statute approach and a case study approach to the findings of seven halal-certified products proven to be non-halal, with primary and secondary legal data sources. The novelty of the study is reflected in a comprehensive analysis of post-certification systemic failures as a gap between the law on the books and the law in action. The results of the study indicate dual legal liability, namely the liability of business actors (based on strict liability and liability based on fault) and the public accountability of BPJPH for negligence in carrying out its supervisory mandate. It was found that consumer legal protection, while strong normatively, proved weak in implementation due to the failure of its preventive (supervisory) function. This study recommends fundamental strengthening of the BPJPH's post-market surveillance function to restore the system's integrity and ensure effective legal protection for Muslim consumers.   Penelitian ini bertujuan mengkaji bentuk pertanggungjawaban hukum pelaku usaha dan BPJPH terhadap produk bersertifikat halal yang terbukti mengandung unsur tidak halal, serta menganalisis perlindungan hukum bagi konsumen yang dirugikan. Latar belakang penelitian didasarkan pada temuan tujuh produk bersertifikat halal yang mengandung unsur babi (porcine), yang menunjukkan urgensi evaluasi efektivitas implementasi tiga pilar regulasi utama (UU Perlindungan Konsumen, UU Jaminan Produk Halal, dan PP No. 42 Tahun 2024) dalam menjamin proteksi yuridis bagi konsumen Muslim. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach) dan pendekatan studi kasus (case approach) terhadap temuan tujuh produk bersertifikat halal yang terbukti tidak halal, dengan sumber data hukum primer dan sekunder. Unsur kebaruan penelitian tercermin pada analisis menyeluruh terhadap kegagalan sistemik pasca-sertifikasi sebagai kesenjangan antara law in the book dan law in action. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan adanya pertanggungjawaban hukum ganda yaitu pertanggungjawaban pelaku usaha (berbasis strict liability dan liability based on fault) dan pertanggungjawaban publik BPJPH atas kelalaian (negligence) dalam menjalankan mandat pengawasan. Ditemukan bahwa perlindungan hukum konsumen, meski kuat secara normatif, terbukti lemah secara implementatif akibat kegagalan fungsi preventif (pengawasan). Penelitian ini merekomendasikan penguatan fundamental pada fungsi pengawasan pasca-pasar (post-market surveillance) oleh BPJPH guna memulihkan integritas sistem dan menjamin perlindungan hukum yang efektif bagi konsumen Muslim.