Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Cakrawala : Jurnal Humaniora Bina Sarana Informatika al-Balagh : Jurnal Dakwah dan Komunikasi Islamic Law and Social Issues in Society Islamic Law and Social Issues in Society
Muhammad Beni Saputra
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
HIP-HOP AND THE LIMITS OF POLITICAL ENGAGEMENT IN THE AGE OF OBAMA Muhammad Beni Saputra
Cakrawala - Jurnal Humaniora Vol 19, No 1 (2019): Maret 2019
Publisher : Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (293.432 KB) | DOI: 10.31294/jc.v19i1.4856

Abstract

Hip hop has the power to be a political force. It has also been successful in mobilizing young people for political activities through organizations and big rappers. Unlike its past where the music genre had a commitment to resist and challenge mainstream politics, the United States presidential election of 2008 changed the tradition from defying politics to actively engaging in it. Obama’s blackness became the impetus to this progressive move for his candidacy was regarded as the most tangible manifestation of a black leader. The political engagement, however,  is limited to the fact that music has been monopolized by few companies and that hip-hop artists often have personal interests when involving in politics.
AHOK AND BLASPHEMY CASE IN KOMPAS AND REPUBLIKA ONLINE MEDIA: A CLASH OF IDEOLOGIES Muhammad Beni Saputra
al-Balagh : Jurnal Dakwah dan Komunikasi Vol. 5 No. 1 (2020): June 2020
Publisher : Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Dakwah UIN Raden Mas Said Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22515/al-balagh.v5i1.1991

Abstract

Ahok's speech in Kepulauan Seribu was viral on the internet. The speech put the ethnic Chinese Christian Jakarta governor into a national spotlight. Mass media then sought to interpret Ahok's speech by framing its content. Using Robert Entman's framing theory, this paper analyzes online media framing of Republika and Kompas on Ahok and a blasphemy case involving him. Content analysis of the news articles published by the two online media shows that the framing of Ahok and the blasphemy case differ in reporting and focus. Kompas Online mostly reported positive news about Ahok, while Republika Online demonstrated a different pattern of framing. On the blasphemy case, Kompas Online focused on defense, whereas Republika Online emphasized that Ahok had insulted Islam and had to be jailed. These differences are manifestations of an ideological clash between Kompas and Republika.
Legal Harmonization of Child Protection in Human Trafficking: A Comparative Study of Indonesian Positive Law and Islamic Law M. Yusuf; Devrian Ali Putra; Rizka Sari Putri; Muhammad Beni Saputra; Daffa Khari Syafiqi
Islamic Law and Social Issues in Society Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): Islamic Law and Social Issues in Society
Publisher : Tuah Foundation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64929/ilsiis.v1i2.14

Abstract

This study analyzes the legal protection of child victims of human trafficking through a comparative examination of Indonesian positive law and Islamic law, with specific reference to the Jambi District Court Decision Number 566/Pid.Sus/2023/PN.JMB. The judgment in this case prioritized the punishment of the perpetrator while neglecting the crucial aspect of victim recovery. In response, the study proposes a model of legal harmonization, arguing that the integration of Islamic legal values into positive law has the potential to create a more comprehensive child protection system that is better aligned with Indonesia’s socio-cultural realities. The research employs a normative juridical approach, using comparative and case study methods, and draws upon statutory provisions, judicial decisions, Islamic legal literature, and relevant scholarly works. The findings demonstrate that both Indonesian positive law and Islamic law recognize child trafficking as a grave offence; however, positive law tends to emphasize punitive sanctions, while Islamic law highlights spiritual dimensions and community responsibility in addressing exploitation. The key differences lie in philosophical underpinnings, the flexibility of sanctions, and the treatment of victim recovery, with positive law adopting a legal-formal stance and Islamic law stressing holistic, community-based rehabilitation. The study concludes that harmonization between the two systems can strengthen prevention, rehabilitation, and protection mechanisms, producing a more equitable and culturally grounded framework. This study contributes to proposing an integrative model that combines the procedural certainty of positive law with the ethical and spiritual depth of Islamic law, consistent with the spirit of Pancasila and advancing the global discourse on culturally responsive child protection.
Legal Harmonization of Child Protection in Human Trafficking: A Comparative Study of Indonesian Positive Law and Islamic Law M. Yusuf; Devrian Ali Putra; Rizka Sari Putri; Muhammad Beni Saputra; Daffa Khari Syafiqi
Islamic Law and Social Issues in Society Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): Islamic Law and Social Issues in Society
Publisher : Tuah Foundation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64929/ilsiis.v1i2.14

Abstract

This study analyzes the legal protection of child victims of human trafficking through a comparative examination of Indonesian positive law and Islamic law, with specific reference to the Jambi District Court Decision Number 566/Pid.Sus/2023/PN.JMB. The judgment in this case prioritized the punishment of the perpetrator while neglecting the crucial aspect of victim recovery. In response, the study proposes a model of legal harmonization, arguing that the integration of Islamic legal values into positive law has the potential to create a more comprehensive child protection system that is better aligned with Indonesia’s socio-cultural realities. The research employs a normative juridical approach, using comparative and case study methods, and draws upon statutory provisions, judicial decisions, Islamic legal literature, and relevant scholarly works. The findings demonstrate that both Indonesian positive law and Islamic law recognize child trafficking as a grave offence; however, positive law tends to emphasize punitive sanctions, while Islamic law highlights spiritual dimensions and community responsibility in addressing exploitation. The key differences lie in philosophical underpinnings, the flexibility of sanctions, and the treatment of victim recovery, with positive law adopting a legal-formal stance and Islamic law stressing holistic, community-based rehabilitation. The study concludes that harmonization between the two systems can strengthen prevention, rehabilitation, and protection mechanisms, producing a more equitable and culturally grounded framework. This study contributes to proposing an integrative model that combines the procedural certainty of positive law with the ethical and spiritual depth of Islamic law, consistent with the spirit of Pancasila and advancing the global discourse on culturally responsive child protection.
Co-Authors Daffa Khari Syafiqi Devrian Ali Putra M. Yusuf Rizka Sari Putri