Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

PERLINDUNGAN PEKERJA ANAK: TANTANGAN DAN UPAYA DARI SUDUT PANDANG HAK ASASI MANUSIA Maulana Ihsyan Azwar
Triwikrama: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Vol. 1 No. 3 (2023): Triwikrama: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial
Publisher : CV SWA ANUGERAH

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.6578/tjis.v1i3.169

Abstract

Perlindungan Pekerja Anak merupakan isu penting dalam konteks hak asasi manusia yang melibatkan tantangan kompleks. Artikel ini mengeksplorasi berbagai aspek terkait perlindungan pekerja anak, termasuk faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi pekerjaan anak, dampaknya terhadap hak asasi manusia, serta upaya-upaya yang telah dan sedang dilakukan untuk mengatasi masalah ini. Dari sudut pandang hak asasi manusia, artikel ini menyajikan pemahaman mendalam tentang perlindungan pekerja anak sebagai upaya penting dalam melindungi hak-hak dasar anak-anak dan mendorong perubahan positif dalam kehidupan mereka.
Negosiasi dan Resolusi Konflik dalam Penetapan Uang Panai’ dan Jujuran pada Perkawinan Bugis–Banjar dalam Perspektif Pluralisme Hukum Maulana Ihsyan Azwar; Ayu Istiya Wahyuni; Achmad Gunaryo
Populer: Jurnal Penelitian Mahasiswa Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): Juni: Populer: Jurnal Penelitian Mahasiswa
Publisher : Universitas Maritim AMNI Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58192/populer.v5i2.4680

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the practice of legal pluralism in determining uang panai’ and jujuran in Bugis–Banjar marriages, the forms of conflict that arise, and the mechanisms of negotiation and conflict resolution employed by the parties involved. This research adopts a qualitative approach using a normative-sociological method through the perspectives of sociology of law and legal pluralism theory. The findings indicate that the practices of uang panai’ and jujuran represent a form of strong legal pluralism, demonstrating the simultaneous operation of two customary legal systems within a single social sphere. Legal pluralism in this context is reflected not only in the coexistence of two distinct customary traditions but also in the interaction, contestation, and negotiation between the Bugis and Banjar customary legal systems, both of which possess social legitimacy within the community. Differences in value orientation between uang panai’, which is based on social prestige, and jujuran, which is oriented toward economic capability, constitute the primary source of conflict. These conflicts are subsequently resolved through non-litigation mechanisms, including family negotiations, customary deliberations, and informal mediation by customary and religious leaders. Nevertheless, these resolution mechanisms tend to be compromise-oriented and have not fully addressed issues of unequal burden distribution and substantive justice. Therefore, legal pluralism in Bugis–Banjar marriage practices not only reflects local cultural diversity but also presents challenges in the form of normative conflicts, contestation of customary authority, and social legal uncertainty.