This Author published in this journals
All Journal Unes Law Review
Jessica Jessica
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Tarumanagara, Jakarta, Indonesia

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

Penilaian Kinerja Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (BPSK) Berdasarkan Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 175K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2021 Jessica Jessica; Ariawan Gunadi
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1105

Abstract

The Consumer Dispute Settlement Agency (BPSK) is a semi-court institution that has the authority to resolve and decide disputes between consumers and business actors on a non-litigation basis. Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection or commonly known as UUPK is a regulatory basis used by BPSK in deciding consumer disputes because UUPK is a law that overshadows all laws that intend to provide protection to consumers. In practice, BPSK is often referred to as an institution that has the authority to examine, resolve, and decide a dispute with a final and binding decision. However, in one example of a case in the Supreme Court decision Number 175K / Pdt.Sus-BPSK / 2021, BPSK decided to impose sanctions on perpetrators outside the authority of BPSK. This is a problem of how to assess the performance of BPSK in deciding consumer disputes. The research method used is normative juridical with a case approach. To improve the performance of BPSK in deciding consumer disputes, it is necessary to update the contradictory UUPK regulations so that BPSK decisions do not cause legal uncertainty for protected consumers. The role burden borne by BPSK is also not balanced with existing Human Resources, so it needs to be improved so that BPSK's performance in deciding consumer disputes can be more careful without overriding applicable laws.