<![CDATA[This study aims to look at student perceptions of the curriculum and learning experiences in higher education (a case study at Quality University). The population is all PGSD study program students with a sample of 135 students. Data collection using survey methods and satisfaction studies.Research results: 1. The suitability of the study program curriculum with the current needs of the labor market, the results obtained are: 11.2% very suitable, 53%, 16.4% quite suitable, and the remaining 19.4% are not suitable and not suitable at all; 2. The study program curriculum prepares students with relevant skills for future careers: 20% is very adequate, 56.3% is adequate, 23% is sufficient; 3. Student responses regarding the study program curriculum integrating theory with practice required in employment: 13.3% highly integrated, 18.5% moderately integrated, 48.1% integrated, and 5.2% less integrated. The results of the learning experience research obtained the following results: 1. In obtaining support and guidance from lecturers in learning: 8.9% were very good, 21.5% were very good, so they knew how to improve good learning methods, 64.4% were good, and the rest stated that they were sufficient; 2. The effectiveness of the learning methods used at the University in facilitating the understanding and application of concepts: 7.4% are very effective and helpful, 17.8% are very effective, 50.4% are effective and 23% are quite effective. 3. Assessment of facilities and resources provided by the university to support student learning: 8.9% very good .important in supporting learning facilities both at home and at school, 15.6% very good, 51.1% rate good, and 21.5% enough.The conclusion is that students' perceptions of the curriculum and learning experience in higher education (a case study at Quality University) are very appropriate and very good.]]>
