Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.886
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Irene Eka Sihombing
Program Studi Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 13 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

 1   2 
ANALISIS GRONDKAART MILIK PT. KAI (PERSERO) SEBAGAI BUKTI KEPEMILIKAN HAK ATAS TANAH Virgia Intansari; Irene Eka Sihombing
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 3 No 4 (2021): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v4i2.13606

Abstract

In the Kebon Kelapa Village, in Central Jakarta, there has been a Dispute of Overlapping Land Rights in which a Certificate of Building Use Rights has been issued on the same plot of land over the state asset land whose control has been granted to PT KAI (Persero) which is still in the form of a Grondkaart or land map. Grondkaart is proof of the inheritance of the Dutch East Indies railway assets which were inherited by PT KAI (Persero). This situation prompted the author to find out the status of the land owned by PT KAI (persero) before the enactment of Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Agrarian Principles and the considerations of the Bandung High Court Judge Number 209/PDT/2019/PT.BDG regarding the legal power of grondkaart PT KAI (persero) as proof of ownership land according to the Agrarian Law. This article uses normative and secondary data, conclusions were drawn using deductive logic methods. The conclusion from the Juridical Analysis is that the status of Grondkaart before the issuance of the UUPA was State Land, and with the publication of the UUPA, Grondkaart should have been converted into a Right to Use by carrying out the Land Registration procedure.
ANALISIS YURIDIS PEMBERIAN PENGGANTIAN RUGI PENYEDIAAN LAHAN PEMBANGUNAN SALURAN UDARA TEGANGAN TINGGI Made Bhisma Abidharma Merada; Irene Eka Sihombing
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 4 No 2 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v4i4.14112

Abstract

It is frequently difficult to provide land within the framework of the public interest. The issue is: is the supply of compensation in the case of Decree Number 3/Pdt.G/2021/PN Sag complies with Law No. 2 of 2012? and how is Land Provided for Building SUTT in Sanggau Regency, West Kalimantan Province? The research is normative, with a description of secondary data and using qualitative analysis and logical reasoning. Research findings, analysis, and conclusions West Kalimantan Province's Sanggau Regency provides land for the construction of SUTT by performing an inventory and Identification of those in possession of, using, and controlling the land; Compensation assessment; Determination of discussions regarding Loss Compensation; Provision of compensation in accordance with the terms outlined in Article 27 (2) of Law No. 2 of 2012, as well as the provision of compensation based on the findings of the land appraisal team and discussions with the land owners who will receive compensation in Sanggau Regency, West Kalimantan Province, in accordance with Articles 34 and 37 (1) of Law No. 2 of 2012 and Article 63 of the President of the Republic of Indonesia's Regulation.
ANALISIS KEABSAHAN JUAL BELI TANAH BERDASARKAN KWITANSI DI KOTA DEPOK Raden Devina Maulina; Irene Eka Sihombing
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 4 No 2 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v4i4.14119

Abstract

According to customary law, purchasing and selling land is an act of transferring rights that are monetary, tangible, and clear in character. The sale and purchase of land by Agus Ariyanto and Sunaryo was not made a deed before the PPAT; rather, it was only proved by a receipt and a statement of sale and purchase in the case of District Court Decision No. 87/Pdt.G/2018/PN.Dpk. However, there are still purchasing and selling practices in people's lives that do not fulfill the clear nature. creation of the issue;  Are legal considerations and the judge's ruling in case number 87/Pdt.G/2018/PN.Dpk about purchasing and selling real estate using just receipt evidence in accordance with Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration. The research method is descriptive normative legal research. The data used are secondary data with primary data and analyzed qualitatively and drawing conclusions with deductive logic. Research results, discussion and conclusions; the sale and purchase of land carried out by Agus Ariyanto (Buyer) and Sunaryo (Seller) can be said to be valid according to the provisions of the Civil Code and fulfills material requirements. 37 of 1998 concerning Regulations for the Position of Officials Making Land Deeds.
Co-Authors Annisa Putri Kusumawardani Elvira Diba Fahlevi Made Bhisma Abidharma Merada Raden Devina Maulina Sarah Jasmine Syafitri Saskia Aulia Putri Virgia Intansari