Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Sasqia Salsabilla
Program Studi Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
TINJAUAN YURIDIS TINDAK PIDANA PERDAGANGAN ORANG DILAKUKAN SECARA BERSAMA-SAMA Sasqia Salsabilla; Fachri Bey
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 4 No. 1 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (237.346 KB) | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v4i1.13422

Abstract

In cases with the numbers 596/Pid.Sus/2021/PN Jkt Utr, 1449/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Sby, and Decision No. 440/Pid.Sus/2020 PN Cbi, it was established that the three defendants had engaged in human trafficking. The findings demonstrated that the defendant's actions in each of the three decisions were consistent with the charges made against him, but Case No. 596/Pid.Sus/2021/PN JKT UTR's application of Article 296 of the Criminal Code was improper because it did not take into account the lex specialis principle derogat legi generalis. The judge used a variety of theories when making the three decisions.
TINJAUAN YURIDIS TINDAK PIDANA PERDAGANGAN ORANG DILAKUKAN SECARA BERSAMA-SAMA Sasqia Salsabilla; Fachri Bey
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 4 No 1 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v4i1.13422

Abstract

In cases with the numbers 596/Pid.Sus/2021/PN Jkt Utr, 1449/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Sby, and Decision No. 440/Pid.Sus/2020 PN Cbi, it was established that the three defendants had engaged in human trafficking. The findings demonstrated that the defendant's actions in each of the three decisions were consistent with the charges made against him, but Case No. 596/Pid.Sus/2021/PN JKT UTR's application of Article 296 of the Criminal Code was improper because it did not take into account the lex specialis principle derogat legi generalis. The judge used a variety of theories when making the three decisions.
Co-Authors Fachri Bey