Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Antonius
Program Studi Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA MEMBUAT SURAT PALSU SEOLAH SURAT ASLI Antonius; Fachri Bey
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (180.757 KB) | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v4i6.15042

Abstract

This research uses a legal-normative research method and the legal materials used in this research are primary legal materials consisting of criminal law books, court decision number 102/Pid.B/2020/PN Nga and also books as secondary legal materials, Circular Letter Number 04 of 2020, doctrine and an expert opinion. The results of the research illustrate that (1) the suspects were declared innocent because they did not fulfill all the elements contained in Article 263 paragraph (1) Jo. Article 55 paragraph (1) 1st of the Criminal Code. The suspect were found guilty in Article 268 paragraph (1) Jo. Article 55 paragraph (1) 1st of the Criminal Code. 2) The form of participation of the suspects based on Article 55 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code, classified into members of the crime who took part in the act (medeplegen, mededader) together.
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA MEMBUAT SURAT PALSU SEOLAH SURAT ASLI Antonius; Fachri Bey
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 4 No 4 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v4i6.15042

Abstract

This research uses a legal-normative research method and the legal materials used in this research are primary legal materials consisting of criminal law books, court decision number 102/Pid.B/2020/PN Nga and also books as secondary legal materials, Circular Letter Number 04 of 2020, doctrine and an expert opinion. The results of the research illustrate that (1) the suspects were declared innocent because they did not fulfill all the elements contained in Article 263 paragraph (1) Jo. Article 55 paragraph (1) 1st of the Criminal Code. The suspect were found guilty in Article 268 paragraph (1) Jo. Article 55 paragraph (1) 1st of the Criminal Code. 2) The form of participation of the suspects based on Article 55 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code, classified into members of the crime who took part in the act (medeplegen, mededader) together.
Co-Authors Fachri Bey