Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Jaringan Penelitian Pengembangan Penerapan Inovasi Pendidikan (Jarlitbang)
Marlina Tri Handari
Unknown Affiliation
Mathematics Other

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
PENINGKATAN HASIL BELAJAR MENULIS NARRATIVE TEXT MELALUI METODE CONTEXTUAL TEACHING LEARNING (CTL) KELAS IX A SMP NEGERI 4 PRACIMANTORO Marlina Tri Handari
Jurnal Jaringan Penelitian Pengembangan Penerapan Inovasi Pendidikan (Jarlitbang) Vol. 9 Nomor 1 Juni 2023
Publisher : Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah dan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kabupaten Wonogiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59344/jarlitbang.v9i1.132

Abstract

This is a Classroom Action Research (CAR) study. The research subjects are 27 students in Grade IX-A at State Junior High School 4 Pracimantoro. Data collection techniques include written tests, observation, and documentation. The research procedure is conducted through two cycles, each consisting of planning, implementation, observation, and reflection. CTL consist of 4 steps, they are invitation, eksploration, explaining and solution also action taking. Invitation consists of material explanation and discussion. Exploration consists of making a group, share a series pictures to each group about narrative text, observation also discussion and arrange a series pictures. Explanation and solution consists presentation of the group discussion result after doing observation and analysis then other group give respond also take summary from the discussion. Action taking consist expressing opinion, asking and answer and give suggestion that have relation with solving problem. The research results were able to answer the research question, which was to improve the narrative writing skills in each cycle. In the initial stage, the class had an average score of 50.59 with a mastery percentage of 7.41% (2 students). In Cycle I, meeting I, the average score improved to 61.33 with a mastery percentage of 25.93% (7 students). In Cycle I, meeting II, the average score further increased to 68.92 with a mastery percentage of 44.44% (12 students). In Cycle II, meeting I, the class achieved an average score of 74.15 with a mastery percentage of 70.37% (19 students), while in Cycle II, meeting II, the average score was 77.41 with a mastery percentage of 88.89% (24 students).
Co-Authors