Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Settlement of Default by the Debtor and Liability of the Creditor in the Pledge Agreement Dilla Pyarrani; Tiara Puspita Sari; Wina Karlina
Ikatan Penulis Mahasiswa Hukum Indonesia Law Journal Vol 3 No 1 (2023): IPMHI Law Journal, January 2023
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang in collaboration with Ikatan Penulis Mahasiswa Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ipmhi.v3i1.57547

Abstract

The condition of people who are experiencing difficulties in the economic field, credit with collateral is needed by community and is the right choice by the community in meeting their needs as an addition to business capital and to meet their daily needs. The purpose of this study to explain the phenomena that occur in debt-receivable agreements with pledged guarantees, the phenomenon that is the existence of customers who are in default. Customers also need to know the responsibilities of a creditor. Research approach with normative juridical analysis. The legal basis for a pawn agreement is regulated by Article 1150 of the Civil Code (Burgelijjk Weetboek). A pawn agreement arises by a legal relationship between debts that are guaranteed to be repaid with movable objects, so that the pawned goods are in the hands of the creditor. Regarding this matter, the creditor must maintain the collateral that was pawn by the debtor. While the debtor is obliged to pay debts to creditors. If one of the parties does not fulfil its obligations, then parties has failed to comply with the agreement. The results from the study show that the legal consequence of debtors who have defaulted are cancellation of agreements and risk transfer. While the responsibility carried out due to the negligence of the creditor on the pawned object is by same item, repair the object and etc in accordance with the negligence that occurred.
Peran Notaris dalam Menjamin Keabsahan dan Autentisitas Akta Kredit Perbankan Dilla Pyarrani; Sisca Ferawati Burhanuddin
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 8 No. 3 (2025): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v8i3.10081

Abstract

This study examines the role of notaries in ensuring the validity and authenticity of authentic deeds in banking credit agreements and analyzes the legal implications of the degradation of their evidentiary value. In banking practice, credit agreements are commonly executed in the form of authentic deeds to guarantee legal certainty and provide conclusive evidence in dispute resolution. However, in judicial proceedings, the evidentiary strength of authentic deeds may be challenged and reduced through counter-evidence, particularly when material or formal defects are proven. This condition raises concerns regarding public trust in notarial deeds and the notarial profession. This research employs a normative juridical method with a statutory and conceptual approach, relying on secondary legal materials obtained through library research. The findings indicate that the evidentiary perfection of authentic deeds depends on a dual responsibility inherent in their classification as partij acte. Notaries are responsible for ensuring formal authenticity through compliance with statutory procedures and the principle of due diligence, while the parties bear responsibility for material validity through good faith in providing accurate information and supporting documents. Failure to fulfill these requirements may result in the degradation of the deed’s evidentiary value, either rendering it void, voidable, or reducing it to a private deed. This study contributes by clarifying the distribution of legal responsibility between notaries and the parties and emphasizes the importance of professional ethics, good faith, and procedural compliance to maintain legal certainty and public confidence in authentic deeds within banking transactions.   Penelitian ini mengkaji peran Notaris dalam menjamin keabsahan dan autentisitas akta autentik perjanjian kredit perbankan serta menganalisis implikasi hukum dari degradasi nilai pembuktiannya. Dalam praktik perbankan, perjanjian kredit umumnya dibuat dalam bentuk akta autentik guna menjamin kepastian hukum dan menyediakan alat bukti yang sempurna dalam penyelesaian sengketa. Namun, dalam proses peradilan, kekuatan pembuktian akta autentik dapat dipatahkan melalui pembuktian sebaliknya apabila terbukti terdapat cacat formil maupun materiil. Kondisi tersebut berpotensi memengaruhi kepercayaan publik terhadap akta autentik dan profesi Notaris. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual, berdasarkan studi kepustakaan terhadap bahan hukum sekunder. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kesempurnaan nilai pembuktian akta autentik ditentukan oleh pembagian tanggung jawab yang melekat pada sifatnya sebagai partij acte. Notaris bertanggung jawab menjamin autentisitas akta melalui ketaatan prosedural dan asas kehati-hatian, sedangkan para pihak bertanggung jawab atas keabsahan materiil melalui penerapan asas itikad baik dalam pemberian keterangan dan dokumen pendukung. Ketidakpatuhan terhadap unsur-unsur tersebut dapat mengakibatkan degradasi nilai pembuktian akta, baik menjadi batal demi hukum, dapat dibatalkan, maupun tereduksi menjadi akta di bawah tangan. Penelitian ini menegaskan pentingnya profesionalitas Notaris, kejujuran para pihak, dan kepatuhan prosedural guna menjaga kepastian hukum serta kepercayaan publik dalam transaksi kredit perbankan.