Darmawan Darmawan
Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

LEGAL ANALYSIS OF UNREGISTERED MARRIAGE VIEWED FROM ULAMA’S PERSPECTIVE IN ACEH PROVINCE Iman Jauhari; Azhari Yahya; Darmawan Darmawan; Dahlan Dahlan; Muhammad Nasir
PETITA: JURNAL KAJIAN ILMU HUKUM DAN SYARIAH Vol 8 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : LKKI Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/petita.v8i2.196

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to scrutinize the legal analysis of unregistered marriage, to identify the factors that cause unregistered marriages, and to analyze the views of ulama about unregistered marriage in Aceh. The method used in this research is an empirical juridical method with a qualitative approach. This research was conducted in Aceh and data collection was carried out by means of field research supported by library research. The results show that marriage registration has been regulated in the Marriage Law and in the Islamic Compilation Law as well as a set of implementing regulations in the field of marriage registration. The factors that cause unregistered marriage in Aceh among others are economic factors, illegal pregnancy, lack of understanding and awareness about marriage law, prolonged affairs, not having a guardian, avoiding administrative procedures, and avoiding adultery. The Acehnese Ulama say that generally, they accept marriage registration because it has benefits for the family such as registration of children's birth certificates, and family cards as administrative requirements in other legal acts. However, they refuse to register the marriage if it is related to other provisions such as the age of marriage, polygamy permits, and disputes involving the family. Abstrak: Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui analisis hukum nikah sirri, mengidentifikasi faktor-faktor penyebab nikah siri, dan menganalisis pandangan ulama tentang nikah siri di Aceh. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode yuridis empiris dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Penelitian ini dilakukan di Aceh dan pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui penelitian lapangan yang didukung oleh penelitian kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pencatatan perkawinan telah diatur dalam Undang-undang Perkawinan dan dalam Kompilasi Hukum Islam serta seperangkat peraturan pelaksanaan lainnya di bidang pencatatan perkawinan. Faktor-faktor yang menyebabkan perkawinan tidak tercatat di Aceh antara lain adalah faktor ekonomi, kehamilan yang tidak sah, kurangnya pemahaman dan kesadaran tentang hukum perkawinan, perselingkuhan yang berkepanjangan, tidak memiliki wali, menghindari prosedur administrasi, dan menghindari zina. Ulama Aceh menerima pencatatan pernikahan karena memiliki manfaat bagi keluarga seperti pencatatan akte kelahiran anak, dan kartu keluarga sebagai syarat administrasi dalam perbuatan hukum lainnya. Namun, mereka menolak pencatatan perkawinan jika dikaitkan dengan ketentuan lain seperti usia perkawinan, izin poligami, dan perselisihan yang melibatkan keluarga. Kata Kunci: Hukum, Pernikahan sirri, Ulama, Aceh, Pandangan.
Legal Certainty versus Substantive Justice: Confiscation of Good-Faith Third-Party Property in Natural Resource Crimes Nasri Nasri; Ilyas Ismail; Efendi Efendi; Darmawan Darmawan; Yusrizal Hasbi
Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun Vol. 14 No. 3 (2026): Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun
Publisher : SCAD Independent

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26811/peuradeun.v14i3.2343

Abstract

This study examined the normative disharmony governing confiscated property owned by good-faith third parties in Indonesia’s natural resource-related criminal cases. It addressed the tension between legal certainty and substantive justice arising from inconsistent confiscation standards across general criminal procedure and sectoral legislation. Using a normative juridical design, the study applied statute, conceptual, and comparative approaches to analyze KUHAP, forestry, fisheries, and mining regulations together with selected judicial decisions. The findings showed that the legal protection of third-party owners varies significantly across sectors because ownership, good faith, non-involvement, and proportionality were not governed by a uniform normative standard. Judicial decisions consequently displayed divergent approaches, with some courts recognizing lawful ownership and lack of involvement, while others prioritized confiscatory provisions. The study developed a harmonized normative framework that integrated ownership verification, good-faith assessment, owner knowledge or involvement, the property–crime nexus, and proportionality. The findings indicated that effective confiscation law should preserve state enforcement authority while preventing legal burdens from being imposed on innocent property owners.