p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Unes Law Review
Mia Hadiati
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Tarumanagara, Jakarta, Indonesia

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Analisis Alasan Mendesak dalam Penetapan Dispensasi Perkawinan Anak Pada Putusan Pengadilan Cilegon Nomor 32/Pdt.P/2019/Pa.Clg Mia Hadiati; Olivia Brilianci
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1167

Abstract

The marital dispensation provision in the latest Marriage Law adopted the ultimum remedium principle, indicating that marital dispensation is granted to parties who have not met the marriageable age limit if there are pressing conditions and no other alternatives. There are three primary factors to be considered in granting marriage dispensation, namely the protection of the child's mental state, intellectual state and parentage. This study intends to analyze the reasons for the urgency in the judge's consideration in the Cilegon District Court Decision No. 32/Pdt.P/2019/PA.CLG and understand the legal consequences of underage marriage in Indonesia. This normative research is descriptive analytical and the type of data analyzed is primary and secondary data collected through literature studies and all research data will be analyzed using qualitative methods. The results of this study indicate that the conditions that occur in the case of decision no. 32/Pdt.P/2019/PA.CLG are actually not compelling or urgent. The Cilegon District Religion Court should have considered other foundations in shar'i, juridical, sociological and health sciences of the candidates before approving the marriage dispensation of the candidates.
Analisa Pembatalan Perkawinan Poligami Akibat Pernyataan Palsu: Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 2530/Pdt. G/2019/PA.Mdn Siti Nurhaliza Dalimunthe; Mia Hadiati
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1195

Abstract

This research aims to analyze cases of cancellation of polygamous marriages due to false statements, with a focus on Case Study Decision Number 2530/Pdt. G/2019/PA.Mdn. The research background involved a lawsuit filed by a man regarding the marriage of Defendant I and Defendant II which was carried out without the knowledge of the Plaintiff as the legal guardian. The research method used is normative qualitative by collecting secondary data from relevant laws and judicial decisions. The results of the research show that the marriage of Defendant I and Defendant II was declared null and void because they did not meet the requirements for a legal guardian, which was linked to the Plaintiff's disagreement as the biological father of Defendant I. This analysis is based on Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage and the Compilation of Islamic Law , and supported by documentary evidence such as a marriage certificate. The research conclusion confirms that court decisions reflect the judge's thoroughness in implementing applicable legal provisions, protecting individual rights, and upholding the validity of marriage. These results contribute to the development of legal precedent regarding the annulment of polygamous marriages due to false statements in the future.
Efektivitas Ketentuan Pasal 2 UUPerkawinan Tentang Perkawinan Beda Agama di Indonesia (Studi Kasus Perkawinan Beda Agama di Indonesia) Leony Valentina Lessnussa; Mia Hadiati
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1398

Abstract

The legitimate of a marriage is clearly stated in the Marriage Law No.1 1974 in article 2, it is declared valid if it is carried out according to the laws of each religion and belief and must be recorded according to the applicable laws and regulations, but then there are other rules contained in the Administration Law No.23 2006 Article 35 states that marriages that occur because of differences in religion are still recorded in the civil registry. This research uses normative (doctrinal) methods. Meanwhile, there are problems related to the legal status arising from interfaith marriages which are registered based on court decisions, so that it becomes a legal issue, but currently the Supreme Court has issued a circular stating that judges in adjudicating such matters will not do so. grant the application for marriage registration submitted at a later day.