Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Perbedaan Hasil Pemeriksaan LED Secara Manual dan Menggunakan Alat Automatic Arip Wahyudi; Maria Nuraeni; Margareta Haiti
Jurnal Laboratorium Prima Vol. 1 No. 1 (2023): Jurnal Laboratorium Prima
Publisher : Fakultas ilmu Kesehatan Universitas Katolik Musi Charitas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32524/jlp.v1i1.1051

Abstract

In 1973 it was stated and published that the Westergren method was the method recommended by the ICSH (International Committee for Standardization in Hematology). The manual LED examination of the Westergren method was carried out on blood samples with EDTA anticoagulant and took 60 minutes, but now an LED examination with One of the automatic methods is using the HumaSRate tool. The HumaSRate tool only takes 20 minutes to examine samples. In this study the researchers examined the differences in LED inspection results manually and using automatic tools. The results of this study found that there were no differences in LED inspection results between methods manual and automatic. Know the differences in LED Inspection Results Manually and Using Automatic Tools This research is an analytic observation with a cross sectional approach using total sampling technique. The research subjects were 33 students who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The results of LED inspection using manual and automatic methods were tested using the Wilcoxon test. The average manual method of LED inspection is 18.5 mm/hour. The average LED inspection by the automatic method is 19.0 mm/hour with a statistical test result of p-value = 0.167 (> 0.05). There is no difference in the results of the LED inspection between the manual and automatic methods. For future researchers, if they want to conduct research similar to this study, it is advisable to conduct research using two different automatic tools and with different sample processing times.
Analysis of Aedes Aegypti Larval Density on The Potential Transmission of Dengue Fever Maria Nuraeni
Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies Vol. 4 No. 3 (2024): Journal Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies
Publisher : Green Publisher Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59188/eduvest.v4i3.1105

Abstract

Dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF) is caused by the dengue virus transmitted through the Aedes aegypti mosquito. DHF remains a health problem in Indonesia. Based on data from the Ministry of Health, there were 184 cases of the disease in 2022, an increase of 94.8% compared to 2021, which had 73,518 cases. According to the Central Statistics Agency of South Sumatra Province, the number of DHF cases in South Sumatra was 2,854 cases, with the highest number in the city of Palembang at 908 cases. This condition requires serious attention. The aim of this study is to analyze the potential transmission of DHF based on entomological evidence in the Sukarami district of Palembang. The method used in the research is a cross-sectional study conducted in December 2023, involving 92 households in the Sukarami sub-district, with a total of 552 containers. The survey results of larval identification under a microscope showed a Larval Free Index of 45.7%, a Container Index of Aedes aegypti larvae of 56.0%, a house index of 73.9%, and a Breteau index of 152.2%. The results of entomological indices indicate a high density of DHF vector mosquitoes Aedes aegypti, which means that this area has a high risk of DHF transmission, thus requiring the control of Aedes aegypti larvae and the eradication of DHF. breeding sites for the vector.