Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : chain journal of computer technology computer engineering and informatics

Kombinasi Simple Additive Weighted dan Rank Order Centroid Dalam Pemilihan Vendor Catering Tri Widodo
CHAIN: Journal of Computer Technology, Computer Engineering, and Informatics Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Volume 2 Number 1 January 2024
Publisher : PT. Tech Cart Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58602/chain.v2i1.90

Abstract

The selection of catering vendors is a crucial stage in planning an event that requires serious attention. The vendor's experience and specialization in serving the desired type of dish is a determining factor, while the ability to tailor the menu to specific needs is a plus. The combination of SAW and ROC can provide a higher level of accuracy in ranking alternatives. SAW provides a simple approach to assigning weight to criteria, while ROC brings the centroid concept to reduce the impact of extreme values. The combination of these two methods can provide more consistent and accurate results. The ranking results of catering vendors using SAW and ROC get the results of rank 1 with a value of 0.8198 for Surya Catering vendors, rank 2 with a value of 0.7972 for Dzaky Catering vendors, rank 3 with a value of 0.7971 for Ratu Catering vendors.
Sistem Pendukung Keputusan untuk Evaluasi Kinerja Menggunakan Metode TOPSIS: Studi Kasus Penilaian Karyawan Aditia Yudhistira; Tri Widodo
CHAIN: Journal of Computer Technology, Computer Engineering, and Informatics Vol. 2 No. 3 (2024): Volume 2 Number 3 July 2024
Publisher : PT. Tech Cart Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58602/chain.v2i3.145

Abstract

Employee performance evaluation is a systematic process carried out by an organization to assess the contribution, ability, and achievement of individuals in carrying out their duties and responsibilities. This process is not only aimed at identifying the best performers, but also to uncover potential employee development as well as areas for improvement. Employee performance evaluations often face challenges in ensuring the objectivity of the assessment, especially when relying on the subjective perception of the appraiser. Traditional methods often rely on the subjectivity of the assessor, which can result in less accurate or unfair evaluations. In addition, in organizations that have many employees with diverse backgrounds and tasks, consistent and comprehensive assessments are becoming increasingly difficult. The purpose of this study is to implement SPK based on the TOPSIS method to evaluate employee performance objectively and systematically, as well as to increase transparency and consistency in the employee performance evaluation process. The ranking results show the ranking of employee performance evaluation results based on the scores obtained by each candidate. Candidate AF ranked first with the highest score of 0.8471, followed by Candidate SR with a score of 0.7055 got second place. The third position was occupied by HA Candidate with a score of 0.4975. The results of this ranking provide an overview of each candidate's overall performance.