Agussalim A Gadjong
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Muslim Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Tinjauan Hukum tentang Larangan Calon Anggota Dewan Perwakilan Daerah Berasal dari Pengurus Partai Politik Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi NO.30/PUU-XV/2018 Muh Saldi; Muin Fahmal; Agussalim A Gadjong
Qawanin Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 2 No 1: Maret – Agustus 2021
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Muslim Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: This study aims to find out how the basic considerations of the Constitutional Court in Establishing the Prohibition of Candidates for Members of the RegionalRepresentative Council come from Political Party Management and What are the Implications of the Prohibition of Political Party Managers from becoming Members of the Regional Representative Council within the framework of a democratic legal state This thesis research uses a normative legal research type, which is based on laws and regulations that use primary legal materials that have binding power as the main basis in this research, including the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and other related regulations. Secondary materials, namely materials that are closely related to primary legal materials and help analyze and understand primary legal materials, such as the results of previous research related to Constitutional Court Decisions. The results of this study indicate that the basic considerations of the Constitutional Court in Establishing the Prohibition of Candidates for Members of the Regional Representatives Council from the Political Party Management are based on Philosophical, Juridical and Sociological Foundations. This is based on the original intent of the formation of the DPD as regional representation reflecting the existence of groups in the region. the community is represented by figures who are members of the DPD so that it is hoped that there will be no double representation. As for the implication of the prohibition of political party administrators from becoming members of the Regional Representatives Council within the framework of a democratic legal state, it is stated that the nomination of DPD members may not come from political party administrators in the general election which then has an impact on the presence of decisions that do not go hand in hand as if they will be contradictory. Abstrak: Penelitian bertujuan untuk mengetahui Bagaimana dasar Pertimbangan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Menetapkan Larangan Calon Anggota Dewan Perwakilan Daerah berasal dari Pengurus Partai Politik Dan Bagaimana Implikasi Larangan Pengurus Partai Politik untuk menjadi Anggota Dewan Perwakilan Daerah dalam kerangka negara hukum Demokratis. Penelitian skripsi ini menggunakan tipe penelitian hukum normatif, yang disandarkan pada peraturan Perundang undangan yang menggunakan bahan hukum primer yang mempunyai kekuatan mengikat sebagai landasan utama dalam penelitian ini, diantaranya Undang – undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 dan peraturan terkait lainnya. Bahan sekunder, yaitu bahan-bahan yang erat hubungannya dengan bahan hukum primer dan membantu menganilisis dan memahami bahan hukum primer, seperti hasil penelitian sebelumnya yang berkaitan dengan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Hasil Penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa dasar pertimbangan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Menetapkan Larangan Calon Anggota Dewan Perwakilan Daerah berasal dari Pengurus Partai Politik disandarkan pada Landasan Filosofis, Yuridis dan Sosiologis.. Hal tersebut didasari pada original intent dari pembentukan DPD sebagai representasi daerah mencerminkan keberadaan golongan-golongan di masyarakat diwakili para tokoh yang menjadi anggota DPD sehingga diharapkan tidak terjadinya double representation. Adapun Implikasi Larangan Pengurus Partai Politik untuk menjadi Anggota Dewan Perwakilan Daerah dalam kerangka negara hukum Demokratis membawa ketentuan pencalonan anggota DPD tidak boleh berasal dari pengurus partai politik pada pemilihan umum yang kemudian berdampak pada hadirnya putusan yang tidak berjalan beriringan seakan akan bertolak belakang.
Effectiveness of Criminal Law Enforcement against Corporations: Procedural Analysis and Mechanisms of Cross Country Criminal Justice Agussalim A Gadjong
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i2.6452

Abstract

The regulation on regional heads in Indonesia, as stipulated in Article 18 of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and the Regional Government Law, prioritizes the principles of democracy and regional autonomy, with an emphasis on direct elections by the people to ensure accountability and legitimacy. However, the appointment of acting regional heads (Pj) that does not involve direct community participation has raised criticism regarding transparency, legitimacy, and lack of public participation. This study aims to formulate regulations related to the appointment of acting regional heads during the transition period to realize responsive law. This study is a normative legal study that prioritizes conceptual and legislative approaches. The results of the study confirm that a responsive legal approach can be a solution, by emphasizing the importance of legal flexibility to respond to community needs, as well as increasing openness, participation, and accountability in the process of appointing Pj. The appointment of Pj by the President and the Minister of Home Affairs without community participation risks worsening the centralization of power, reducing the role of community participation, and damaging the essence of democracy. Therefore, more inclusive reforms are needed in this process to strengthen a government system that is more responsive to community aspirations. Therefore, revisions to the Regional Government Law and the Regional Election Law are very necessary to ensure a more transparent, accountable, and better community involvement in the appointment process for Acting Heads.