Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.778
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Madani: Multidisciplinary Scientific Journal Socius: Social Sciences Research Journal Jurnal Hukum dan Konstitusi Jurnal Pemasyarakatan dan Keadilan
Irwan Triadi
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Medicine & Pharmacology Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis Yuridis Pelaksanaan Peradilan Koneksitas Dalam Hukum Acara Peradilan Militer di Indonesia Diva Pramesti Islami; Irwan Triadi
Madani: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Vol 1, No 10 (2023): November
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.10149140

Abstract

The ability of general courts to try cases involving crimes committed by both military personnel and civilians is an exception or deviation from the rule that a person must be tried in every court. Articles 3 and 4 of Law Number 5 of 1950 which regulate the authority of military justice and are linked to the topic of criminal acts (crimes and violations), give us a glimpse of the importance of the relationship. In general, general provisions apply to all cases handled jointly by military courts that can be justified and military courts that cannot be justified, unless there are special requirements. For example, losses caused by illegal activities would be more appropriately handled through military justice, provided that the Supreme Court has given its approval for the case to be tried in a military court
Analisis Yuridis Kasus Pelecehan Seksual Yang Dilakukan oleh Anggota Tentara Nasional Indonesia Karina Hasiyanni Manurung; Irwan Triadi
Socius: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Vol 1, No 5 (2023): December
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.10258639

Abstract

Sexual harassment is a serious problem that is rampant throughout Indonesia, where it affects various levels of society. The existence of sexual harassment perpetrators in the military is a complicated focal point because it contradicts the main task of the military which should uphold the values of security and state integrity. This research will discuss the criminal liability of members of the Indonesian National Army (TNI) who commit sexual harassment and how law enforcement against members of the Indonesian National Army (TNI) who commit sexual harassment. This research uses normative juridical method with statutory approach and conceptual approach. Through strict law enforcement, it is hoped that a system can be created that can prevent and eradicate acts of sexual harassment among the military, so that the integrity and public confidence in the state defense institutions are maintained.
Doxing as a Cybercrime: A Comparative Study Between Indonesia and Singapore: Doxing Sebagai Kejahatan Siber: Studi Komparatif Antara Indonesia dan Singapura Ranisa Diati; Irwan Triadi
JIC : Jurnal Hukum dan Konstitusi Vol. 1 No. 4 (2025): JIC : Jurnal Hukum dan Konstitusi
Publisher : anwarpublisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64272/43ax5b53

Abstract

The development of digital technology has given rise to new forms of crime that have not been fully anticipated by traditional legal systems. One increasingly prevalent phenomenon is the practice of doxing, which is the act of disclosing and disseminating someone's personal information without permission for a specific purpose, often to harass, intimidate, or harm the victim. The purpose of this study is to analyze doxing as a form of cybercrime from the perspective of Indonesian and Singaporean law. In Indonesia, regulations regarding doxing have not been specifically regulated, but can only be prosecuted through Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions (UU ITE) and its amendments, and Law Number 27 of 2022 concerning Personal Data Protection (UU PDP). In contrast, Singapore has been more progressive by explicitly prohibiting doxing through the Protection from Harassment Act (POHA) of 2014, which was later updated. The normative-comparative legal research method compares the legal constructions of Indonesia and Singapore in addressing doxing and examines the urgency of establishing specific regulations in Indonesia. The research findings indicate that Indonesia's regulations remain general and do not provide adequate legal certainty, while Singapore has succeeded in providing more concrete legal protections for doxing victims. The researchers recommend that Indonesia immediately formulate specific regulations regarding doxing, either through a revision of the UU ITE or the creation of a new law on cybercrime.
Legal Protection for Gaslighting Victims: A Case Study of Mataram District Court Decision Number 23/Pid.Sus/2025/Pn Mtr: Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Korban Gaslighting: Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Mataram Nomor 23/Pid.Sus/2025/Pn Mtr Ranisa Diati; Cassis Merinthia Ariapramuda; Glori K. Wadrianto; Irwan Triadi
Jurnal Pemasyarakatan dan Keadilan Vol. 1 No. 4 (2025): Jurnal Pemasyarakatan dan Keadilan (JPK)
Publisher : Anwar Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64272/4nhap422

Abstract

Gaslighting as a form of psychological violence is now a significant concern due to its serious impact on victims, particularly in the form of reality manipulation and self-doubt. Although the term gaslighting is not explicitly regulated in Indonesian criminal law, its practice can be found in the categories of psychological violence, sexual harassment, and abuse of trust. The Mataram District Court Decision Number 23/Pid.Sus/2025/PN Mtr is relevant to study because the panel of judges emphasized the elements of "abuse of trust" and "exploitation of the victim's vulnerability" in sentencing the defendant, which are consistent with the practice of gaslighting. This study uses a normative juridical method with a case study approach to the decision, supported by an analysis of legislation, victimology theory, and the concept of legal protection. The results show that the legal framework in Indonesia actually recognizes psychological violence, but its implementation in court is still limited. The main challenge lies in proving gaslighting because it is non-physical in nature, so that the testimony of the victim, expert witnesses, and digital evidence is very important. The Mataram District Court's ruling can be considered progressive because it imposed a severe sentence, but victim protection, particularly psychological recovery and restitution, still needs to be strengthened. Therefore, the development of more comprehensive evidentiary guidelines and policies is needed to ensure legal protection for gaslighting victims.
Co-Authors Cassis Merinthia Ariapramuda Diva Pramesti Islami Glori K. Wadrianto Karina Hasiyanni Manurung Ranisa Diati Ranisa Diati