Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Kelayakan dan Penerapan Artificial Intelligence (AI) sebagai Direktur Perusahaan Yuda Darma Jaya; Muh. Jufri Ahmad
Madani: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Vol 1, No 10 (2023): November
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.10201856

Abstract

This research uncovers the implementation of AI in companies with a focus on feasibility and implementation aspects. Examines key challenges in implementing AI, including legal and ethical compliance, and provides possible solutions for safe and productive AI integration. The aim is to identify barriers, evaluate compliance, and offer guidance for the appropriate use of AI and in accordance with normative regulations (Normative Legal Research) or literature research. Normative research is legal research to discover legal rules, legal principles, by collecting legal materials, such as legal norms, legal rules, and legal principles which are then analyzed to produce a prescription regarding the problem formulation. The results of this research shows that AI can provide major benefits within the enterprise, but faces a number of regulatory challenges. Key findings involve expanding legal, ethical and data privacy compliance in implementing AI. Cooperation between companies, government and stakeholders is needed to create balanced regulations and support the safe and efficient use of AI. A revision of the Company Law is needed to clarify the role, authority, responsibilities, rights and obligations of artificial intelligence in company directors. Legal regulations need to specifically regulate how artificial intelligence providing commands will be held legally accountable, highlighting the urgency regarding accountability for AI actions that can have significant legal impacts.
Analisis Ratio Legis Penghapusan Pasal 102 Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2009 Tentang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup Aditya Aulia Rahman; Muh. Jufri Ahmad
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 4, No 2 (2026): June
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21256632

Abstract

The removal of criminal sanctions for the management of Hazardous and Toxic Waste (B3) under Law Number 6 of 2023, which ratified Government Regulation in Lieu of Law Number 2 of 2022 on Job Creation into law, has generated considerable debate within the field of environmental law. Although this policy reform is intended to promote a more favorable investment climate through regulatory simplification, it also raises concerns regarding environmental protection and the effectiveness of legal enforcement against activities that may cause environmental pollution. This study aims to examine the ratio legis underlying the removal of criminal sanctions for B3 waste management following the enactment of the Job Creation Law. The research adopts a normative legal method using statutory, conceptual, and historical approaches. Primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials were analyzed qualitatively through legal interpretation. The findings reveal that the repeal of Article 102 of Law Number 32 of 2009 reflects a shift in legal policy toward deregulation, the simplification of business licensing procedures, enhanced investment competitiveness, and the implementation of a risk-based regulatory approach. Furthermore, the policy demonstrates a transformation in the paradigm of environmental law enforcement through the application of the ultimum remedium principle, whereby criminal sanctions function as a last resort after administrative measures have proven ineffective. Nevertheless, considering the significant risks posed by B3 waste to human health and environmental sustainability, the effectiveness of this policy depends on strengthening administrative oversight mechanisms, ensuring the consistent enforcement of administrative sanctions, and enhancing the institutional capacity of government authorities to supervise and monitor environmental compliance. Therefore, the success of this legal policy relies not only on amendments to statutory provisions but also on the effective implementation of administrative supervision to ensure the continued protection of the environment.