Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Paradigma Hukum Pembangunan Gloria Justitia
Putri Purbasari Raharningtyas
Unika Atma Jaya
Humanities Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
KRITISI SISTEM PERTANGGUNG JAWABAN NEGARA ATAS PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM STUDI PERBANDINGAN ACTIO POPULARIS DI HUNGARIA Halomoan Benarivo; Putri Purbasari Raharningtyas; Febiana Rima Kainama
Gloria Justitia Vol 1 No 2 (2021): JURNAL GLORIA JUSTITIA
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25170/gloriajustitia.v1i2.3069

Abstract

Citizens' lawsuits or commonly referred to as Citizen Lawsuits or Actio Popularis are the main access for citizens to sue the government because of their negligence in making decisions that result in unlawful acts committed by the government. In Indonesia, this lawsuit is not familiar to the public because actually this lawsuit is growing rapidly in the common law system country, but due to several things, Indonesia has finally implemented this. In fact, this lawsuit is also developing in Civil Law countries, for example Hungary, but because it is not as popular as in the United States as a common law system, Indonesia finally uses the term applied in common law countries, namely citizen lawsuit and does not use the term developed in civil law countries, namely action popularis. As a result, citizen lawsuits that develop in Indonesia are far from perfect, and often result in misunderstandings or misinterpretations and lead to inappropriate judges' decisions.
DISCRIMINATION AGAINST DOMESTIC WORKERS: STRUCTURALINEQUALITY AND THE URGENT NEED FOR PRIVATE LEGAL PROTECTIONTHROUGH INDONESIA’S DOMESTIC WORKER PROTECTION BILL putri purbasari raharningtyas; Dellvin Sergio
Jurnal Paradigma Hukum Pembangunan Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): JURNAL PARADIGMA HUKUM PEMBANGUNAN – FEBRUARI 2026
Publisher : Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25170/paradigma.v11i1.7754

Abstract

            2004 marked the first year for the Domestic Workers Protection Bill (RUU PPRT) to be passed as a law. 21 years later, Indonesia’s legislators still fail to see its urgency. Domestic Workers in Indonesia have a substantial role in sustaining a household, where the majority of them goes undocumented. Without a clear and formal agreement, Domestic Workers may face multitudes of discrimination and exploitation. With predominant Domestic Workers being women and/or underage, the vulnerability of this group becomes prominent, especially in highlighting the extremity of the dire need for legal protection. This paper sought to answer two questions, how does structural discrimination shape working conditions of domestic workers in Indonesia, and how can the Domestic Workers Protection Bill (RUU PPRT) address these systemic inequalities? Through a normative-juridical approach, this paper finds various structural victimization that may impede on the rights of these workers, ranging from economic structural victimization to social structural victimization. This paper also highlights current laws and regulations and how it failed to extensively protect Domestic Worker’s rights, this was also furthered by the ambiguity stance of Domestic Workers in Indonesia’s current legal frameworks. In conclusion, Indonesia still needs to address and acknowledge Domestic Workers as formal employees and ensure social and legal protection of their rights.
Co-Authors Dellvin Sergio Febiana Rima Kainama Halomoan Benarivo