p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Unes Law Review
Fauziah Lubis
Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum, Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Analisis Obstruction Of Justice dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Fauziah Lubis; Juliana PC.Sinaga
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1519

Abstract

The aim of this research is to analyze obstruction of justice from a criminal law perspective. The type of legal research method used in this research is a normative research method. The approach methods that will be applied are the Statute Approach and the Case Approach. The data collection technique uses library research (normative legal research) which focuses on secondary data, so the author conducted research on laws and government regulations relating to this research. Data collection tools in normative juridical research come from secondary data with the aim of obtaining concepts, theories and information as well as conceptual thoughts from previous researchers in the form of statutory regulations, scientific works, journals and others. The data analysis technique begins with examining the collected data, then conducting direct and directed interviews, then conducting qualitative data analysis, that is, the data obtained is arranged systematically and then analyzed qualitatively in the form of rules. The results of this research found that the criminal act of obstruction of justice as regulated in the provisions of Article 21 Article 21 of Law no.31 of 1999 Jo Law no. 20 of 2001 concerning Eradication of Corruption Crimes and Article 22 of Law no. 21 of 2007 concerning the Eradication of the Crime of Human Trafficking is a crime in which the perpetrator commits acts by obstructing the justice process against laws that are actually clear and against law enforcement such as giving false information, committing violence, destroying evidence, premeditated crimes and make threats. As stated in Article 221 paragraph (1), the Criminal Code threatens with criminal penalties for anyone who hides or helps someone who commits a crime so that the person avoids investigation or detention. In the criminal act of obstructing the legal process (obstruction of justice) apart from being viewed from the act which contains a mistake on the part of the perpetrator which must be considered as intentional as intended, and the act is clearly in conflict with the applicable laws and regulations then the act can be is said to be a criminal act/criminal act.
Implementation of Restorative Justice, The Intent of Punishment, and Legal Clarity In Indonesia Fauziah Lubis; Fatimah Zahara; Wanda Hamidah
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1521

Abstract

This study looks at the fairness of restorative justice, the goal of punishment, and the need of legal certainty. According to the study's findings, restorative justice is still only being applied theoretically. In this instance, it emphasizes that the formalistic, long-established ideas of justice that have arisen in society and are applied in Indonesian customary law assemblies serve as the foundation for the genuine aim of sentencing. In contrast, the notions of individual deterrence and general deterrence call for actions to be absolute in order to produce a deterrent impact. Afterward, the idea of reform or rehabilitation was further developed. The use of restorative justice emphasizes the recovery of victims' material losses as a result of the perpetrators' unlawful acts, both physically and psychologically. This is done through a consensus-building process involving the perpetrator, the victim, the perpetrator's family, and the victim's family, as well as, if necessary, the community and the appropriate authorities. With relation to legal norms and values, this research methodology is normative juridical along with theories, legal doctrine, jurisprudence, applicable rules and regulations, as well as pubiications pertinent to the research topic. According to the study's findings, restorative justice is a noble form of justice when instances of illegal behavior have happened. Therefore, repair or restoration is crucial if the victim is to be rehabilitated or healed from the suffering he has endured on a material, physical, or psychic level. To be clear, restorative justice does not apply to all crimes; rather, it only does so in circumstances involving crimes against children, minor offenses, women in conflict with the law, and drug-related offenses. In order to provide clarity, there should be a firmness if the offender does not want to make restitution even though it is deemed capable of doing so in terms of material capabilities. There also needs to be concrete sanctions so that restorative justice is not only limited to other options; the legal framework for it should be expanded to the Constitution.