Ridha Wahyuni
Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jakarta

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Protection of the Normative Rights of Platform Workers: A Comparative Study of Indonesia and Singapore Bona Jevon Tampubolon; Ridha Wahyuni
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 4 (2026): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i4.3373

Abstract

This research analyzes the legal vacuum in providing protection for platform workers in Indonesia. The massive growth in the number of digital workers in recent years has not been matched by the fulfillment of their normative rights. However, the protection of the workforce and the right to a decent livelihood are constitutional mandates, as stipulated in Article 27 of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Using a normative (doctrinal) legal research method through statutory and comparative approaches, this study finds that the state must intervene in this regulatory vacuum by formulating adaptive laws. Through a comparative study, Singapore has proven successful in formulating protection via the Platform Workers Act by establishing a "Third Category" status; this approach accommodates the fulfillment of social security, work injury compensation, and the right to unionize, without eliminating the inherent flexibility of the digital economy industry. Therefore, this research recommends that the Government of Indonesia immediately draft specific regulations (lex specialis) to achieve a harmonious balance between the continuous innovation of the digital economy and the guaranteed dignity and welfare of the workers.
Ideal Supervisory Framework for The Disclosure of Health Information on Ready-To-Eat Processed Foods for Consumer Protection: A Comparative Legal Study of Indonesia and Chile Daffi Allegra Asmara; Ridha Wahyuni
Jurnal Daulat Hukum Vol 9, No 2 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/jdh.v9i2.53578

Abstract

The high consumption of sugar, salt, and fat (GGL) in Indonesia contributes to the increasing prevalence of non-communicable diseases or degenerative diseases, so that the fulfillment of consumers' rights to clear information as guaranteed by Article 4 letter c of Law No. 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection has become an urgent issue in the context of labeling of processed ready-to-eat foods. This study examines two problems, namely the implementation of supervision of the obligation to include health risk information based on the Decree of the Minister of Health Number HK.01.07/MENKES/301/2026 and the ideal form of implementation of such supervision through a comparison with the Chilean warning label system. The method used is normative juridical with a statutory and comparative legal approach. The results of the study indicate that the implementation of supervision in Indonesia is not optimal because the KMK does not appoint a specific supervisory agency and does not contain strict sanctions for violations of the inclusion of Nutri-Level. Based on a comparison with the Chilean warning label system regulated in Ley No. 20.606, the ideal form of supervision in Indonesia includes several elements, namely clarity of supervisory institutions, specific tiered administrative sanctions, expansion of coverage to all business actors without differentiating business scale, expansion of coverage to all business actors without differentiating business scale, and protection of vulnerable groups through a ban on the sale and promotion of high GGL products in educational environments.
Protection of Musical Work Copyright on Digital Platforms: A Comparative Study of Indonesian and United States Law Citra Bintang Maranatha Manurung; Ridha Wahyuni
Jurnal Daulat Hukum Vol 8, No 4 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/jdh.v8i4.49088

Abstract

The development of digital technology has changed the way people produce, distribute, and use musical works. However, this progress has also increased the potential for copyright infringement, especially on User-Generated Content (UGC) platforms such as YouTube, TikTok, and Instagram. In this context, Law No. 28 of 2014 on Copyright protects the moral and economic rights of creators, but it lacks the technical rules required to address violations in the digital environment. The absence of a notice-and-takedown mechanism, safe harbor provisions, and an obligation to use automated detection technology indicates that Indonesia’s legal framework remains inadequate to address large-scale infringements. In contrast, the United States, through the DMCA 1998, provides detailed regulation of notice-and-takedown procedures, safe harbor requirements, and platform obligations in dealing with repeat infringers. Through a normative, juridical, and comparative legal approach, this study analyzed differences between the Indonesian and U.S. systems and identified gaps that weakened copyright enforcement in Indonesia. The findings show that Indonesia requires more specific technical regulations to support adequate protection on digital platforms. Therefore, this research proposes an ideal protection model comprising four integrated components: clear, binding technical regulations, automated detection technology, a centralized copyright database, and a fair monetization mechanism. The integration of these elements is expected to strengthen copyright enforcement, enhance legal certainty, and support a more accountable and sustainable digital ecosystem.