Ridha Wahyuni
Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jakarta

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Protection of the Normative Rights of Platform Workers: A Comparative Study of Indonesia and Singapore Bona Jevon Tampubolon; Ridha Wahyuni
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 4 (2026): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i4.3373

Abstract

This research analyzes the legal vacuum in providing protection for platform workers in Indonesia. The massive growth in the number of digital workers in recent years has not been matched by the fulfillment of their normative rights. However, the protection of the workforce and the right to a decent livelihood are constitutional mandates, as stipulated in Article 27 of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Using a normative (doctrinal) legal research method through statutory and comparative approaches, this study finds that the state must intervene in this regulatory vacuum by formulating adaptive laws. Through a comparative study, Singapore has proven successful in formulating protection via the Platform Workers Act by establishing a "Third Category" status; this approach accommodates the fulfillment of social security, work injury compensation, and the right to unionize, without eliminating the inherent flexibility of the digital economy industry. Therefore, this research recommends that the Government of Indonesia immediately draft specific regulations (lex specialis) to achieve a harmonious balance between the continuous innovation of the digital economy and the guaranteed dignity and welfare of the workers.
Ideal Supervisory Framework for The Disclosure of Health Information on Ready-To-Eat Processed Foods for Consumer Protection: A Comparative Legal Study of Indonesia and Chile Daffi Allegra Asmara; Ridha Wahyuni
Jurnal Daulat Hukum Vol 9, No 2 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/jdh.v9i2.53578

Abstract

The high consumption of sugar, salt, and fat (GGL) in Indonesia contributes to the increasing prevalence of non-communicable diseases or degenerative diseases, so that the fulfillment of consumers' rights to clear information as guaranteed by Article 4 letter c of Law No. 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection has become an urgent issue in the context of labeling of processed ready-to-eat foods. This study examines two problems, namely the implementation of supervision of the obligation to include health risk information based on the Decree of the Minister of Health Number HK.01.07/MENKES/301/2026 and the ideal form of implementation of such supervision through a comparison with the Chilean warning label system. The method used is normative juridical with a statutory and comparative legal approach. The results of the study indicate that the implementation of supervision in Indonesia is not optimal because the KMK does not appoint a specific supervisory agency and does not contain strict sanctions for violations of the inclusion of Nutri-Level. Based on a comparison with the Chilean warning label system regulated in Ley No. 20.606, the ideal form of supervision in Indonesia includes several elements, namely clarity of supervisory institutions, specific tiered administrative sanctions, expansion of coverage to all business actors without differentiating business scale, expansion of coverage to all business actors without differentiating business scale, and protection of vulnerable groups through a ban on the sale and promotion of high GGL products in educational environments.