Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal DIRAYAH : Jurnal Ilmu Hadis
Melia Novera
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Education Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
PENGGUNAAN TA’WIL, TARJIH DAN NASKH DALAM PEMAHAMAN HADIS Melia Novera
DIRAYAH : Jurnal Ilmu Hadis Vol. 2 No. 01 (2021): DIRAYAH : Jurnal Ilmu Hadis
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Al-Qur'an (STIQ) Ar-Rahman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62359/dirayah.v2i01.50

Abstract

This study shows that Muslims need the methods used by scholars in taking hadith fiqh including the ta'wil, tarjih, and naskh methods. Ta'wil is a phrase about taking the meaning of lafadz which is probability supported by the proposition and makes a meaning stronger than the meaning pointed by lafadz dzahir. The explanation is according to Imam al-Ghazali. Furthermore, there are several takwil requirements, the base of ta’wil and the classification of ta’wil. Tarjh is to set an advantage on one side that is opposite each other. Or make something stronger. The term is to compare the signs that strengthen him in front of his opponent While the meaning of nasakh itself is canceling a law with the proposition that comes later. It extends to the discussion of the criteria of nasakhs and texts that do not accept the nasakh that includes the criteria of the nasakh itself.
KRITIK SANAD DAN MATAN : Telaah Kitab Khulasoh Adz-zahabiyah fi Qawaidi oleh Dr. Tageldin Abbas Melia Novera; Vina Qurrotu A'yun
DIRAYAH : Jurnal Ilmu Hadis Vol. 4 No. 02 (2024): DIRAYAH : Jurnal Ilmu Hadis
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Al-Qur'an (STIQ) Ar-Rahman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62359/dirayah.v4i2.266

Abstract

This paper discusses the method of criticism of Sanad and Matan. In the Hadith studies, both aspects are equally important. Sanad is a series of narrators who convey the hadith, while matan is the content of the hadith itself. To find out the quality of a hadith we must find out the quality of its transmitters and content. Therefore, this paper is important because it discusses the method of criticism of Sanad and Matan. includes the critical methodology of sanad and matan seen in the periods of the Prophet, Companions, Tabi'in, and Tabi' tabi'in. In this study the author uses a historical approach, and in analyzing the data the author uses the descriptive-analysis method. Regarding the critical study of hadith, it has actually been carried out since the time of the Prophet and his companions. However, the criticism of sanad and matan in the initial phase has not been formulated as systematically and methodologically as in the final phase (alMuta`akhirîn). This is because there is still the figure of the prophet as an authoritative source to ask (clarify) the news that friends hear. After the death of the Prophet Muhammad SAW, there have not been many problems in the hadith, apart from that there are still friends who always maintain their honesty and do not want to lie in the name of the Prophet SAW. Criticism of hadith during the time of the Companions focused on testing the truth of whether the Prophet actually conveyed the hadith or not. The source of this paper comes from books/books, and journals that are relevant to the theme of the writing.
Co-Authors Vina Qurrotu A'yun