Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.817
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Multidisiplin Borobudur Constitutum: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum
Andi Nurhidayah
Universitas Borobudur
Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Engineering Health Professions Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Perlindungan Hukum Korban Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga Berdasarkan Putusan Nomor 881/Pid.Sus/2020/Pn.Bks. Vica Saista Garanica; Dilla Haryanti Tarigan; Andi Nurhidayah; Mugiati
Jurnal Multidisiplin Borobudur Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): Edisi Khusus
Publisher : Universitas Borobudur

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37721/jmb.v1i2.1316

Abstract

Setiap pasangan suami dan istri dalam membangun rumah tangga yang dicita-citakan adalah kehidupan berumah tangga yang bahagia, harmonis, tentram dan bahagia selamanya. Selain sudah merupakan suatu kewajiban bagi pasangan untuk menjadikan rumah tangga harmonis, juga merupakan dasar dan tujuan dari perkawinan. Namun dalam kehidupan tak selamanya berjalan sesuai dengan apa yang diharapkan. Dalam berbagai aspek sering terjadi tindakan kekerasan dalam rumah tangga yang mengakibatkan korban. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui perlindungan hukum terhadap korban kekerasan dalam rumah tangga dan untuk mengetahui pertimbangan majelis hakim dalam menjatuhkan sanksi terhadap pelaku kekerasan dalam rumah tangga. Metode pendekatan yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah yuridis normative. Perlindungan hukum yang diberikan kepada korban kekerasan dalam rumah tangga adalah bersifat preventif yang berupa sosialisasi peraturan perundang-undangan yang berkaitan dengan tindak pidana tersebut. Sedangkan yang bersifat represif berupa perlindungan yang diberikan oleh pihak keluarga maupun oleh aparat penegak hukum dan menjatuhkan sanksi kepada pelaku. Sebagai dasar pertimbangan hakim dalam menjatuhkan sanksi dalam Putusan Nomor 881/Pid.Sus/2020/Pn.Bks adalah pelaku sudah memenuhi unsur-unsur yang tercantum dalam Pasal 14A Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.
HAK IMUNITAS ADVOKAT DALAM MENJALANKAN PROFESI HUKUM Andi Nurhidayah
Constitutum: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 2 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Borobudur

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37721/constitutum.v2i1.1337

Abstract

An advocate is someone whose profession is to provide legal services which can be done in court and outside court. As a client's legal representative, an advocate acts as a spokesperson representing the client's interests before court, arbitration, or in negotiations. Advocates compose legal arguments, prepare legal documents, and defend their clients' interests. Advocates' immunity rights are regulated in Article 16 of Law Number 18 of 2003 concerning Advocates which states that advocates cannot be prosecuted, either civilly or criminally, because they carry out their professional duties in good faith for the benefit of client defense. The problem is how to use the right of advocate immunity in resolving criminal cases? And what are the obstacles that arise in using Advocate immunity rights in resolving criminal cases? The method used is a normative legal research method. The use of the right to advocate immunity in resolving criminal cases is a right that is always protected by law, however the granting of this right has limitations, namely moral values, the essence of good faith, honesty, greater legal interests and responsibility. Obstacles to the use of advocates' immunity rights in resolving criminal cases can be seen that there are still a number of advocates who are involved in corruption cases or who obstruct legal officers in uncovering a criminal case.
UPAYA POLRI DALAM MENANGGULANGI TINDAK PIDANA PENCURIAN KENDARAAN BERMOTOR DI WILAYAH HUKUM POLSEK GALIS KABUPATEN BANGKALAN MADURA JAWA TIMUR Muafi; Andi Nurhidayah
Constitutum: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Borobudur

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37721/constitutum.v3i1.1607

Abstract

The crime rate of motor vehicle theft continues to increase along with the increasing economic burden and increasing unemployment rates. This has a significant impact on community welfare. This study discusses the factors causing motor vehicle theft and the efforts made by the Indonesian National Police (Polri) in overcoming motor vehicle theft in the jurisdiction of the Polsek Galis, Bangkalan Regency, Madura, East Java. The research method used is normative juridical combined with empirical juridical. The results of the study indicate that the factors causing motor vehicle theft in the Polsek Galis include economic difficulties, sociological factors (social interactions, lack of parental supervision of teenagers), environmental factors, and lack of vigilance and negligence of residents. The efforts made by the Polri in overcoming motor vehicle theft in the jurisdiction of the Polsek Galis show that the approach taken is more repressive. In addition, in handling motor vehicle theft cases in particular, the process carried out is to uncover the theft case, report it, then hold a meeting for evaluation. This allows for action to be taken to reduce and uncover motor vehicle theft. However, there are still challenges in practice, such as the lack of facilities and human resources, which are very important for the effectiveness of law enforcement.
PELAKSANAAN PEMBERIAN BANTUAN HUKUM KEPADA MASYARAKAT MISKIN DI YAYASAN LEMBAGA BANTUAN HUKUM LEMBAGA PENGAWASAN KEBIJAKAN PEMERINTAH DAN KEADILAN (YLBH LP-KPK) Andi Nurhidayah; Amirul Suriatno Piola
Constitutum: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Borobudur

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37721/constitutum.v3i2.1707

Abstract

The government has issued Law Number 11 of 2016 concerning Legal Aid, but to date, many poor people have not been reached and have not received maximum benefits from legal aid provided by legal aid institutions. This study discusses the implementation of legal aid provision to the poor at the YLBH LP-KPK and the obstacles faced in providing such legal aid. This study uses an empirical normative juridical research method. The results show that the implementation of legal aid provision to the poor at YLBH LP-KPK begins with the application and examination stage of the legal aid application, acceptance or rejection of the legal aid application, and the provision of legal aid through litigation and non-litigation. The implementation of the legal aid provision is in accordance with the provisions of Articles 2 to 17 of Law Number 16 of 2011 concerning Legal Aid. Obstacles faced in providing legal aid to the poor include not having an identity card, not understanding the law, not being able to read and write, and when submitting a legal aid application, it turns out that they have given power of attorney to another legal aid institution or advocate.
Co-Authors Amirul Suriatno Piola Dilla Haryanti Tarigan Muafi Mugiati Vica Saista Garanica