Surbakti, Farrel Eden
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

PERBANDINGAN KEDUDUKAN DAN KEWENANGAN KEPOLISIAN DALAM KONSTITUSI YANG PERNAH BERLAKU DI INDONESIA Surbakti, Farrel Eden; Abdilah, Ali
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The police are defined as a tool of the state in charge of maintaining the security and order of the community, providing protection, and providing protection to the public. The relationship between the community and the police themselves is mutually influencing, where the existence of the police is functional in the structure of life. When people experience changes due to various factors, then there is also a change in moral standards that result in order and order of life according to previous cultures are no longer used. This is what causes the role and function of the police must always adjust. The police are referred to as determining concretely what is called order enforcement. The importance of the existence of police institutions in Indonesia has become generally accepted. But regarding the position of the police institute in the Indonesian constitutional arrangement is still a problem. With the constitution changing from the era of independence to the era of reform, the position of the police in the constitutional arrangement has changed.
Etika Hakim dalam Kehidupan Sehari-hari: Penggunaan Media Sosial oleh Hakim di Indonesia Surbakti, Farrel Eden
Jurnal Konstitusi & Demokrasi Vol. 2, No. 2
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

With the development of technology which is rapidly making the community easier in communicating and searching for information such as social media. Social media itself has different characteristics and types and has advantages and disadvantages. The use of social media does not look at a person's status such as age, gender, religion, or profession. At this time many judges use social media to communicate and search for information and interact with the community. Judges in carrying out their obligations as bearers of the legal profession are framed by an institutional institution that is formulated into a code of ethics for the professional profession of judges. Judges within the Supreme Court and lower judicial bodies are bound by the Code of Ethics and the Code of Conduct for Judges (KEPPH) as outlined in the Joint Decree of the Chief Justice and Chair of the Judicial Commission in 2009. Indonesian judges are not prohibited from using social media but the use of social media by judges can raise very important questions because the way judges use social media can influence people's trust in judges in court. In KEPPH there are no rules or ways for judges to use social media. So the judge is unconsciously still bound by KEPPH when using social media. At this time there are still judges who violate KEPPH in using social media. In various countries such as Canada, Rhode Island and UN organizations have made rules and ways for judges to use social media properly and correctly so as not to reduce the public's trust in judges. Therefore, this research was conducted aiming to help the Supreme Court and the Judicial Commission to be able to make regulations or guidelines against judges in using social media, as well as judges to be able to use social media properly and correctly