p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Anayasa Law Journal
Tomi Agustian
Institut Agama Islam Negeri Curup

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

PROBLEMATIKA INDEPENDENSI KEKUASAAN KEHAKIMAN DI INDONESIA DALAM TINJAUAN HUKUM ISLAM Tomi Agustian; Despan Heryansyah
Law Journal (LAJOUR) Vol 2 No 1 (2021): Law Journal (LAJOUR) April 2021
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Bina Insan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32767/law.v2i1.64

Abstract

Tegaknya keadilan dengan terwujudnya kekuasaan kehakiman yang independen sebagaimana cita-cita UUD 1945. Khususnya Pasal 24 1945, yang berbunyi “Kekuasaan kehakiman merupakan kekuasaan yang merdeka untuk menyelenggarakan peradilan guna menegakkan hukum dan keadilan”. Prinsip ini kemudian dilegalformalkan dalam Pasal 1 Undang-Undang No. 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman. Akan Tetapi pada prinsipnya didalam Undang-Undang MA yang memuat ketentuan bahwa pengangkatan Hakim Agung oleh Presiden atas usul DPR dan pemberhentian Ketua, Wakil Ketua, Ketua Muda, dan Hakim Anggota MA juga dilakukan oleh Presiden atas usul MA, ternyata disitu Presiden mempunyai celah yang nantinya dapat mempengaruhi psikis hakim dalam membuat keputusan. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan normatif dan yuridis guna mencari kesesuaiannya dengan prinsip keadilan dalam Islam, karena dalam Islam (baik nas al-Qur’an atau hadis) tidak memuat secara eksplisit tentang adanya kekuasaan kehakiman. Penyusun menyimpulkan pengangkatan dan pemberhentian hakim oleh Presiden tentu saja tidaklah tepat karena dapat mempengaruhi psikis hakim dalam membuat keputusan dan hal ini dapat mengaburkan makna Pasal 24 UUD 1945 dan menunjukkan kurang independennya kekuasaan kehakiman.
A NORMATIVE LEGAL STUDY OF THE INDEPENDENCE OF THE JUDICIAL BRANCH OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT WITHIN THE SYSTEM FOR APPOINTING CONSTITUTIONAL COURT JUSTICES IN INDONESIA Tomi Agustian; Dinda Setiawati
ANAYASA : Journal of Legal Studies Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): ANAYASA
Publisher : PT. Altin Riset Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61397/ays.v4i1.558

Abstract

Article 24, paragraph 1 of the 1945 Constitution states, “The judicial branch is an independent branch of government responsible for administering justice to uphold the law and justice,” However, Article 24C, paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia stipulates that the Constitutional Court shall consist of nine constitutional justices appointed by the President, with three nominees each proposed by the Supreme Court, the People’s Representative Council, and the President,” and in Law No. 7 of 2020 on the Constitutional Court, Article 18(1) states that three Constitutional Court Justices are nominated each by the Supreme Court, the People’s Representative Council, and the President. Thus, the President, the Supreme Court, and the People’s Representative Council. This study aims to examine the independence of the Constitutional Court in Indonesia. It employs a normative legal approach. The conclusion is that the nomination process for the nine Constitutional Court Justices—proposed by the President, the House of Representatives, and the Supreme Court—may influence a judge’s decision-making, particularly regarding the review of legislative acts issued by the House of Representatives and the President, as well as the review of laws —which falls under the authority of the President and the Supreme Court—as well as adjudicating election disputes and the dissolution of political parties, all of which are within the Constitutional Court’s jurisdiction as stipulated in the 1945 Constitution,  thereby undermining the intent of Article 24, paragraph 1, of the 1945 Constitution, which safeguards the independence of the judiciary in upholding justice in accordance with the ideals of the 1945 Constitution.