Arrisman
Universitas Nasional, Jakarta, Indonesia

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

ANALISIS HUKUM TERHADAP PELANGGARAN HAK CIPTA PENGGUNA MEDIA SOCIAL APLIKASI TIKTOK DITINJAU MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 28 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG HAK CIPTA Sumarjo Makitulung; Arrisman
JOURNAL OF LAW AND NATION Vol. 1 No. 4 (2023): Journal of Law and Nation
Publisher : INTELIGENSIA MEDIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The use of the TikTok application in practice reaps pros and cons, because the TikTok application has a feature for uploading songs using songs from the application users themselves, which sometimes users do not do permission for the songs uploaded to the application. The problems in this research are How to identify copyright infringement by users of the TikTok application?, What is the legal protection for creators/copyright holders in the event that their songs are used in the TikTok application without approval according to Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright?, What is accountability? law on TikTok application users for copyrighted songs used in the TikTok application without the consent of the creator/copyright holder according to Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright?. The research method used is the juridical normative method, namely the researcher will analyze based on secondary data which includes laws and books. The results of the research show that the identification of copyright infringement by users of the TikTok application according to Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright, namely violating moral rights and economic rights. Legal protection for creators/copyright holders in the event that their song is used in the TikTok application without approval according to Law Number 28 of 2014 is that the copyright holder has the right to take legal action through litigation/court and non-litigation/settlement outside the court. These legal efforts are criminal and civil legal efforts. The legal responsibility of TikTok application users for copyright infringement in the TikTok application according to Law Number 28 of 2014 can be distinguished in the criminal and civil domains.
ANALISIS YURIDIS DIREKSI PERSEROAN TERBATAS YANG TIDAK MENYELENGGARAKAN RAPAT UMUM PEMEGANG SAHAM TAHUNAN BERDASARKAN PASAL 79 AYAT (1) UNDANG- UNDANG REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 40 TAHUN 2007 TENTANG PERSEROAN TERBATAS Yasin Yasin; Arrisman
JOURNAL OF LAW AND NATION Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): Journal of Law and Nation
Publisher : INTELIGENSIA MEDIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research aims to conduct a juridical analysis of the Directors of Limited Liability Companies (PT) which do not hold Annual General Meetings of Shareholders (AGMS) in accordance with the provisions of Article 79 Paragraph (1) of Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies. This research uses normative legal research methods with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results of the analysis show that failure to hold an AGMS by PT Directors can have serious legal consequences, including potential legal violations and negative impacts on the interests of shareholders. The existence of the AGMS as a shareholder control mechanism is strictly regulated in law to ensure transparency, accountability and shareholder participation in company strategic decision making. In this context, this research also identifies factors that cause the PT Board of Directors to not hold an AGMS, such as a lack of understanding of legal regulations, unsupportive internal policies, or even negligence of related parties. Therefore, efforts are needed to improve and strengthen regulations and legal awareness among business actors so that the implementation of the AGMS can be carried out effectively in accordance with the spirit of the law. In conclusion, the failure to hold an AGMS by PT Directors is a serious problem that requires legal attention and system improvements. This research contributes to understanding the impact of law and its causal factors, and emphasizes the importance of compliance with legal regulations to maintain company integrity and sustainability.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP IZIN USAHA PERTAMBANGAN BATU BARA DI INDONESIA BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 25 TAHUN 2007 TENTANG PENANAMAN MODAL Siti Soleha; Arrisman
JOURNAL OF LAW AND NATION Vol. 2 No. 3 (2024): Journal of Law and Nation
Publisher : INTELIGENSIA MEDIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Coal mining in Indonesia is a strategic sector but also sensitive because it is closely related to the economy and the environment. To regulate this activity, the Indonesian government has issued Law Number 25 of 2007 concerning Capital Investment. This law provides the legal basis for coal mining business permits, which includes requirements, procedures and legal protection. The purpose of this article is to analyze the legal protection of coal mining business permits in Indonesia based on Law Number 25 of 2007. The research method used is literature study to collect and analyze relevant legal data. The results of the analysis show that Law Number 25 of 2007 provides a comprehensive legal framework for coal mining business permits, including application procedures, conditions that must be fulfilled by applicants, and obligations that must be complied with by permit holders. Apart from that, this law also regulates sanctions for violators. However, there are still challenges in implementing this law, such as consistent law enforcement and adequate environmental protection. Therefore, further efforts are needed to ensure that legal protection for coal mining business permits in Indonesia can be carried out effectively in accordance with the spirit of the law.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KONSUMEN MUSLIM ATAS PEMBERIAN VAKSIN CORONA VIRUS DISEASE 2019 (COVID-19) DITINJAU DARI UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 33 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG JAMINAN PRODUK HALAL Edi Gustia Bahri; Arrisman
JOURNAL OF LAW AND NATION Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): Journal of Law and Nation
Publisher : INTELIGENSIA MEDIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Article 28E paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution has affirmed the right of every individual to practice their religion, choose education, work, citizenship, residence, and the right to return to the territory of the country. This article affirms that the state grants basic rights to its citizens to embrace religion and worship according to their beliefs. The majority of the Indonesian population is Muslim, which has an obligation to avoid things that are forbidden and consume halal. Law Number 33 of 2014 concerning Halal Product Guarantees mandates that all products circulating in Indonesia must have halal certificates. However, in the COVID-19 vaccination program, the government has not provided a guarantee of the halalness of several types of vaccines such as Astra Zeneca, Johnson and Johnson, Moderna, Novavax Inc, and the Pfizer Inc. And BioNTech vaccines. Problem formulation, What is the Legal Position of Muslim Consumers based on laws and regulations in Indonesia? What is the Legal Protection Given to Muslim Consumers for the Provision of the Corona Virus Disease (COVID-19) Vaccine in Indonesia? The research method used is the Normative legal research method with document study data collection techniques and expert interviews, the data obtained is processed and analyzed using qualitative methods (not using numbers or mathematical formulas). The Republic of Indonesia is not a religious state, but the Republic of Indonesia which is based on Pancasila places religion in an important position, so it is very natural that many laws and court decisions recognize and guarantee the position of a religion including Islam and Muslim consumers in the Republic of Indonesia. Legal protection for Muslim consumers is a right that must be given to Muslim citizens, meanwhile, the state also has a responsibility to protect all its citizens, including providing protection and guarantees for the halal and goodness of the COVID-19 vaccine product (Halalan Toyyiban) several types of COVID 19 vaccines provided and distributed by the Government through the Indonesian Ministry of Health to the Indonesian people, some of which are halal certified, some are not halal certified (haram) and some are even not halal certified / not halal at all. Supervision and Socialization regarding laws and regulations related to Halal Product Guarantee (JPH) need to be massively increased to various interested parties, especially the Government as the Organizer of Halal Product Guarantee, Business Actors, and Consumers.