Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-Tasyree: Jurnal Bisnis, Keuangan dan Ekonomi Syariah Qonuni: Jurnal Hukum dan Pengkajian Islam Epistemé: Jurnal Pengembangan Ilmu Keislaman
Andi Iswandi
Universitas PTIQ Jakarta, Indonesia
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Tata Kelola Koperasi Syariah di Indonesia: Studi Literatur Review Andi Iswandi
Al-Tasyree: Jurnal Bisnis, Keuangan dan Ekonomi Syariah Vol. 15 No. 02 (2023): Al-Tasyree: Jurnal Bisnis, Keuangan dan Ekonomi Syariah
Publisher : Prodi Ekonomi Syariah, Fakultas Syariah, Institut PTIQ Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59833/altasyree.v15i02.1527

Abstract

This study comprehensively evaluates the implementation of governance in Sharia cooperatives in Indonesia, focusing on decision-making, transparency, and justice. In the context of rapid economic growth, Sharia cooperatives are expected to be an alternative financial pillar, adhering to Sharia principles and promoting economic justice and sustainability. However, previous research has identified several obstacles, including a lack of transparency, low member participation, challenges in implementing Sharia principles, and structural issues. In-depth literature reviews, such as those by Wahyudin et al. (2022) and Nurhidayati (2018), cover the dimensions of Sharia cooperative governance, highlighting crucial factors affecting governance quality. This study employs a descriptive analytical method, collecting data from literature, official documents, and recent publications. The analysis indicates that many Sharia cooperatives have not fully implemented effective governance, requiring improvements in transparency, member participation, Sharia principle application, and structural enhancements. The conclusion emphasizes the urgency of improving the quality of Sharia cooperative governance to effectively contribute to sustainable and inclusive economic development in Indonesia. The implications of this research involve recommendations for enhancing Sharia cooperative governance, providing valuable guidance for stakeholders, and enriching scholarly literature in the fields of cooperatives and Sharia economics.
Komparasi Studi Fenomenologi dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Harta Warisan Ditinjau dari Perspektif Kompilasi Hukum Islam dan Undang-Undang Perkawinan di Indonesia Andi Iswandi
Qonuni: Jurnal Hukum dan Pengkajian Islam Vol. 3 No. 01 (2023): Qonuni: Jurnal Hukum dan Pengkajian Islam
Publisher : Prodi Ahwal Syakhsiyah, Fakultas Syariah, Institut PTIQ Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59833/qonuni.v3i01.1162

Abstract

This study compares the phenomenological approach in resolving inheritance disputes, with a focus on the views of the Compilation of Islamic Law and the Marriage Law in Indonesia. This study uses the phenomenological method to explore the experiences and meanings given by individuals or groups regarding the settlement of inheritance disputes. The results showed that the majority of participants had a strong understanding of the provisions of Islamic law and marriage laws in the context of inheritance distribution. They tend to believe that resolving inheritance disputes based on Islamic law is fairer than civil law. The role of the mediator is considered very crucial, and participants feel it is important to make settlement procedures more accessible and understandable to the community. The conclusion of this study shows that a strong understanding of Islamic law and marriage laws can affect the outcome of inheritance dispute resolution. Furthermore, giving the role of mediator and efforts to increase accessibility and public understanding of settlement procedures can increase the effectiveness of resolving inheritance disputes in Indonesia. This research provides additional insight into the dynamics of resolving inheritance disputes in the context of Islamic law and civil law in Indonesia.
NEGOTIATING MUSLIM IDENTITY THROUGH BOYCOTT: Indonesian Muslim Diaspora in Malaysia and the Netherlands Andi Iswandi; Dito Alif Pratama
Epistemé: Jurnal Pengembangan Ilmu Keislaman Vol. 21 No. 01 (2026)
Publisher : UIN Sayyid Ali Rahmatullah Tulungagung, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study examines how members of the Indonesian Muslim diaspora negotiate their religious identity through boycott of Israel-affiliated products, comparing the contrasting settings of Muslim-majority Malaysia and Muslim-minority Netherlands. Addressing a gap at the intersection of boycott studies, Muslim diaspora scholarship, and transnational Islamic activism, the article treats boycott not as an individual psychological disposition but as a socially and politically embedded practice through which diasporic Muslims articulate belonging, solidarity, and moral commitment. Drawing on semi-structured interviews with twenty-two diaspora members—eleven in each country—analysed comparatively and interpreted through the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) as a heuristic lens, the study argues that boycott functions as a repertoire of identity negotiation whose meaning is shaped by diaspora identity and host-country socio-political opportunity structures. The findings reveal a shared baseline of moral awareness regarding the Palestinian issue but sharply divergent modes of enactment. In Malaysia, boycott is institutionalized and normalized—sustained by strong social norms, institutional legitimacy, and the ready availability of alternative products—allowing Muslim identity to be expressed collectively and with little friction. In the Netherlands, boycott is more fragmented and conditional, as a Muslim minority translates confessional commitments into universalist human-rights claims amid weaker normative support from the government and informational uncertainty. Variation, the study demonstrates, is driven not primarily by differences in religiosity but by the degree of alignment between identity, social norms, and structural conditions. The article thus offers a transnational, identity-centred account of Muslim boycott activism and shows how diasporic Islamic identity is negotiated differently across distinct socio-political ecologies.
Co-Authors Dito Alif Pratama