Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Study on Incentive Price of Fermented Cocoa to Overcome Reluctance of Farmer to Apply Fermentation : Case Study in Jembrana Regency Joko Soemarno; Yuli Hariyanti; Soetanto Abdoellah Soeparto; Diany Faila Sophia Hartatri
Pelita Perkebunan (a Coffee and Cocoa Research Journal) Vol 31 No 2 (2015)
Publisher : Indonesian Coffee and Cocoa Research Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22302/iccri.jur.pelitaperkebunan.v31i2.66

Abstract

Improving cocoa quality through encouraging farmers to do fermentation is one of the ways to increase the added value of cocoa. However, majority ofIndonesian farmers are reluctance to do fermentation. This research aimed to study factors causing farmers reluctant to do fermentation, weight differencebetween fermented and unfermented cocoa, cocoa processing time difference between fermented and unfermented cocoa, quality difference between fermentedand unfermented coco refers to cocoa bean standard (SNI): 01-2323-2008/Amd-2010, and feasible added value incentive of fermented cocoa beans. The data collectionwere conducted through household farmers’ survey, focus group discussion and experimental research. The experimental research was conducted to understandthe weight and processing time differences; and to asess the quality, including moisture content, bean count, pH and fermentation index. Analysis of the datawere conducted by methods of Fishbone Ishikawa and logit multiplier linear analysis. The research results showed that the main factors causing farmers reluctant todo fermentation were insuitable of selling price of fermented cocoa, the existence of village collectors in buying unfermented cocoa, the lack of cooperation amongfarmers in farmer group (Subak Abian) and the lack of farmers’ skills on cocoa bean fermentation. This study also found that the weight depreciation differencebetween fermented and unfermented cocoa was 0.5-3.75%, and the processing time difference between fermented and unfermented cocoa was 12-24 hours. Qualityof fermented cocoa beans was higher than that of unfermented cocoa beans and it can fulfill the standard of SNI: 01-2323-2008/Amd-2010. It was found that thefeasible added value incentive of fermented cocoa benas was 2,126-3,426 IDR/kg. Keywords: cocoa, fermentation, unfermented, quality, incentive
Analisis Jaringan Irigasi pada Daerah Irigasi Waduk Tenggor Desa Tenggor Kecamatan Balongpanggang Gresik: Analysis of Irrigation Network in the Tenggor Reservoir Irrigation Area, Tenggor Village, Balongpanggang Subdistrict, Gresik Yuli Hariyanti; Dewi Nusantara, Danayanti Azmi
Jurnal Rekayasa Infrastruktur HEXAGON Vol 8 No 2 (2023): HEXAGON
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32528/hexagon.v8i2.1104

Abstract

The irrigation system at Tenggor Reservoir in Tenggor Village, Balongpanggang, Gresik cannot be used to irrigate rice crops. Water volume frequently decreases and is not used to its fullest potential. Therefore, in order to correctly manage water resource management, it is required to analyze the irrigation network in an attempt to restore the irrigation network's functionality. The FJ Mock method for calculating the mainstay discharge gave the highest 80% value of 1,597 m3/s with the greatest discharge requirement of 1,456 m3/s. The overall reservoir capacity was calculated using reservoir storage. The reservoir's overall storage capacity was found to be 219345 m3, as well as its effective capacity of 186443 m3 and its dead capacity of 32902 m3. The NFR of Tenggor Irrigation Area with the paddy's planting pattern is 1.083 lt/dt/ha. The total capacity needed for irrigate is 287067 m3 whereas the availability of an effective capacity is 186443 m3. So, with the availability of 70% of the effective capacity, it can supply the irrigation areas of 860 ha with twice of planting patterns. The study's findings include five different channel dimensions with various water levels. Type 1 for tertiary channels with B and H dimensions of 0.50 meters each. For secondary channels with various B sizes in order, type 2, type 3, and type 4: B = 0.50, 0.70, 0.80, and the same H sizes are 1.00 meters, respectively. Type 5 with B = 1.30 m and H = 1.50 m for the main channel.