Mutamakin Mutamakin
STAI Ma’had Aly Al-Hikam Malang, Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Social Conflict as a Perspective in Interdisciplinary Islamic Studies Mutamakin Mutamakin
BELIEF: Sociology of Religion Journal Vol 1, No 2 (2023)
Publisher : UIN Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30983/belief.v1i2.7380

Abstract

Interdisciplinary studies demand an understanding of multiple disciplines across disciplines. In the social sciences discipline, the results of sociology research are growing rapidly and have formulated new theories that can be utilized in interdisciplinary studies. Among these is the theory of social conflict. The perspective of social conflict departs from the assumption that inequality exists in all societies. Social conflict theory focuses on various aspects of power status in social positions. Individual identification characteristics are viewed from ethnic or ethnic perspectives, gender, age, religion, expertise, and social status. This social conflict theory can be applied as a perspective in interdisciplinary Islamic studies, this is due to the aim of Islamic studies is to describe the relationship between Islam and various aspects of human life, explaining the spirit (ethos) of Islam in the form of moral and values within Islamic teaching. Thus, approaching Islam through the lens of social conflict theory within Islamic studies got it relevance as Islamic teaching responses to various new paradigms as a result of advances in science and technology and the emergence of new philosophies and ideologies as well as the relationship between Islam and the vision, mission, and goals of Islamic teachings.
Jābirī’s Three Epistemes and Ṭāhā’s Three Levels of ʿAql: Toward an Islamic Epistemology of Artificial Intelligence Mutamakin Mutamakin; Syarif Hidayatullah; Agus Himawan Utomo; Aris Fauzan; Zaedun Na'im
Kanz Philosophia: A Journal for Islamic Philosophy and Mysticism Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): June
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Sadra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20871/kpjipm.v12i1.585

Abstract

The epistemological challenge posed by generative artificial intelligence lies not only in its capacity to produce religious language that sounds persuasive but also in the risk that such fluency may be mistaken for legitimate knowledge. Recent discussions on religion and AI have examined ethics, governance, and digital mediation. Yet, they have not sufficiently explained how machine-generated sacred-style discourse can appear epistemically authoritative within Islamic traditions. This article addresses that gap through a dual-grid framework that brings al-Jābirī’s epistemic modes into dialogue with Ṭāhā’s hierarchy of reason. Using a qualitative philosophical analysis of AI-generated religious-style discourse, the study asks not whether AI is a knower, but what kind of knowledge affects its outputs generated in religious settings. The analysis indicates that AI can simulate textual authority, logical coherence, and spiritual resonance, while lacking the classical warrants that ground knowledge in Islamic epistemology, namely causal intelligibility, accountable transmission, and disciplined formation. On that basis, the study suggests that generative AI is most plausibly situated at the level of al-‘aql al-mujarrad (abstract reason) and introduces the concept of epistemic flattening to explain how distinct modes of knowing may be compressed into similar output effects. The article concludes by proposing a constructive response centered on Islamic epistemic literacy, accountability-oriented governance, and a relational understanding of knowledge within an Islamic philosophy of technology.