Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Merit system in promotion of primary high leadership positions in Majene regency Muhammad salim Alimuddin; Sangkala Sangkala; Badu Ahmad
Jurnal Mantik Vol. 7 No. 4 (2024): February: Manajemen, Teknologi Informatika dan Komunikasi (Mantik)
Publisher : Institute of Computer Science (IOCS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35335/mantik.v7i4.4455

Abstract

The aim of this research is to find out the promotion mechanism for Pratama high leadership positions, whether a merit system has been implemented or not. The mechanism for promoting Primary high leadership positions in the Majene Regency regional government illustrates the principle of a merit system. At each level, promotions are held to become pratama high leaders due to vacancies in positions caused by the retirement of officials, transfers of officials and deaths of officials filling the positions. The principle of openness to all can be seen in information about job vacancies via social media, electronic media and print media covering the West Sulawesi region, but on the contrary, the principle of the best candidate in making the regent's decision as a regent candidate. The Civil Service Development Officer (PPK) has not presented a merit system because when announcing the list of names of the top three participants from the final selection results, the selection committee did not transparently announce the participants' scores, but only announced the names of the participants based on the alphabetical order of the first letter of the participants and at the stage of determining the selected participants. , the Personnel Development Officer (PPK) is given authority or prerogative. appoint 1 (one) person from the 3 (three) names proposed by the selection committee. This is what participants complained about because the action seemed less objective and transparent. This research uses qualitative methods with interview techniques, where the committee and participants are informants
Analysis of DKI Jakarta's APBD Fund Allocation Policy for Improving the Quality of Public Services at the City Level Wa Ode Rahmin W; Badu Ahmad; Muhammad Rusdi
LEGAL BRIEF Vol. 13 No. 3 (2024): August: Law Science and Field
Publisher : IHSA Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35335/legal.v13i3.1056

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of the allocation of funds from the Jakarta Regional Revenue and Expenditure Budget (APBD) in supporting the improvement of the quality of public services at the city level. By taking a qualitative approach, data was obtained from literature studies and analysis of documents related to the management of the Jakarta Regional Budget from 2008 to 2012. The results show that although there is an increase in regional revenue and expenditure growth during this period, there are still obstacles that hinder the effectiveness of APBD fund allocation, such as budget irregularities, weak budgeting control, and political dominance in budget decision-making. However, efforts to strengthen transparency, accountability, and community participation in the budgeting process were identified as potential solutions to address these barriers. This study illustrates the importance of effective management of public funds in improving the quality of public services at the city level, especially in the context of the Jakarta Regional Budget