Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

AGRIBISNIS NENAS DI KECAMATAN TANAH PUTIH KABUPATEN ROKAN HILIR Jum’atri Yusri; Novia Dewi; Satria Gunawan
Indonesian Journal of Agricultural Economics Vol 11, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31258/ijae.11.1.11-21

Abstract

The purposes of this research are mention as follows : 1) To know the condition of Pineapple agribusiness’ subsystems at Kecamatan Tanah Putih,  2) to analyze the income of Pineapple’s farming at kecamatan tanah putih.  This research was conducted at Kecamatan Tanah Putih Kabupaten Rokan Hilir with the amount of sample is 32 person through survey method. This was descriptive analysis research. The research result that drawn on supply of subsystem and production of facility supply shown that the 6 criteria direct on seeds, fertilizer, pesticide,and Pineapple farming equipment which exist at Kecamatan Tanah Putih were already proper as its supply, affordable, and available at the research location. The production of Pineapple at Kecamatan Tanah Putih Kabupaten Rokan Hilir on average were 8.400 pieces/ha/year,  cost on average Rp. 12.423.300-/ha/year. Gross income as much as Rp. 33.600.000-/ha/year, net income as much as Rp. 20.174.300-/ha/year, RCR as much as 2,5.  The application of subsystem were not went well, it is caused by the farmers were not able to process the Pineapples into valuable items such as pineapple chips or other. There were 4 marketing channels. The farmers of pineapple only have 2 marketing channels as a producer which is marketing channel to intermediary traders and marketing channel directly to the consumers. The farmers tend to choose the marketing channels through the intermediary traders. The supporting institutions of pineapple farming have not runs maximally.
DETERMINATION OF BREACH IN ORAL LENDING AGREEMENTS WITHOUT AGREEMENT OF RETURN TIME REVIEWED FROM THE AGREEMENT LAW Satria Gunawan; Gunawan Djajaputra
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 3 No. 5 (2023): September
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v3i5.1006

Abstract

The agreement in its implementation constitutes a binding legally binding between one party to another party who enters into the agreement. Agreements can be made orally or in writing provided that they do not conflict with the provisions stipulated by laws and regulations. Sometimes in the implementation of the agreement, the parties sometimes do not carry out the contents of the agreement, so that in practice the legal system in Indonesia is known as a default or broken promise. In 2011, there was a dispute between Manginar Sagala and Absen Malau regarding the loan provided by Manginar Sagala to Absen Malau. In the loan agreement, it was agreed that Manginar Sagala would lend Rp. 137,000,000. - (one hundred thirty seven million rupiah) to Absen Malau where this agreement was made orally. However, until 2017, Absen Malau had no good faith intention to repay the loan and challenged him by saying that he would just put me in prison. On December 4, 2020 Manginar Sagala through his attorney sent a letter of warning/subpoena to Absen Malau but there was no response at all from Absen Malau. So that Manginar Sagala sued Absen Malau at the Medan District Court with a lawsuit that Absen Malau had defaulted (broken promise). What is the formulation of this research problem regarding the provisions regarding verbal loan agreements? As well as how is the determination of default in the loan agreement orally without an agreed return time in terms of the law of the agreement? The method used in this research is the normative legal method. The results of the analysis show that the provisions regarding verbal lending and borrowing agreements when viewed from the form of the agreement, whether written or oral or non-contractual, will not affect the binding strength of an agreement as long as the essence of the agreement made does not conflict with applicable legal principles.