This Author published in this journals
All Journal Problematika Hukum
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Implikasi Pasal 32 ayat (2) dan (3) Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2011 terhadap Pemenuhan Standar Nasional Indonesia (SNI) Terkait Penyediaan Perumahan oleh Pengembang Real Estate Fennieka Kristianto
Problematika Hukum Vol 4, No 1: January 2018
Publisher : President University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33021/ph.v4i1.1335

Abstract

The enactment of Law Number 1 of 2011 concerning Housing and Settlement Areas (the Housing Act) since 2011 raises several counter-productive potentials for the housing sector in Indonesia. There are new problems related to the application of the Indonesian National Standard and it has implications for housing developers both in terms of technical and juridical aspects, which are interesting to examine in depth. What are the possibilities faced by a housing developer if the requirements for fulfilling the requirements of the Indonesian National Standard must be met by a housing developer? How is the application of Article 32 paragraph (2) and (3) of the Housing Law when faced with realities on the ground? The normative research method is used and is intended to criticize several articles in the Housing Law regarding their implications for housing provision by housing developers with the obligation to use domestic products that must meet the Indonesian National Standard (SNI).
IMPLEMENTATION OF DISCLOSURE PRINCIPLE TOWARDS PUBLIC COMPANIES: JURIDICAL ANALYSIS ON LAW NO. 8 YEAR 1995 AND PERPU NO. 1 YEAR 2020 Fennieka Kristianto; Fidela Gracia
Problematika Hukum Vol 7, No 2 (2021)
Publisher : President University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33021/ph.v7i2.5172

Abstract

The development of a country is influenced by several sectors which include the economic sector and it is considered to be one of the most essential factors in the growth or 3development of the country. The development of Indonesia itself is known to be immensely affected by economic growth. This economic growth is likewise running and participated by a lot of parties from Indonesia as well as foreign parties which are obtained through their investment here in Indonesia. One of the most influential parties within economic growth is the capital market itself which functions to help business actors. However, due to the current situation caused by the pandemic COVID-19, the Indonesian Government issued a Regulation of The Government in place of Law No. 1 in the year 2020 concerning Kebijakan Keuangan Negara dan Stabilitas Sistem Keuangan Untuk Penanganan Pandemic Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) dan/atau Dalam Rangka Menghadapi Ancaman Yang Membahayakan Perekonomian Nasional dan/atau Stabilitas Sistem Keuangan (hereinafter referred to as PERPU COVID-19). As this regulation is implemented it raises several issues regarding the relevant existing law. The research method that is enforced within this journal is analytical normative research, this research is a general exploration that is likely aiming to execute legal aspects functioning as a prescriptive order, and in this method, the law from the stance of the norms will be inspected. This research is fulfilled through the implementation of a statute approach that is completed by evaluating the relevant laws and regulations relating to the issues set forth within this research. This journal will analyze the applicable regulations, as well as the contradictory matters, that arise from PERPU COVID-19 about the disclosure principle towards public companies.Keywords: Disclosure Principle, Emiten, Public Company, Capital Market, Capital Market Law.Article History
DAMPAK KEPAILITAN PENGEMBANG RUMAH SUSUN TERHADAP TRANSAKSI JUAL BELI RUSUN (STUDI KASUS RUSUNAMI KEMANGGISAN RESIDENCES) Fennieka Kristianto
Problematika Hukum Vol 1, No 2: July 2015
Publisher : President University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33021/ph.v1i2.311

Abstract

The uncompleted Flats construction and not provided the Certificate of Property Rights on Flats Unit (SHM Flats Unit) make Flats Unit’s purchaser only has the Conditional Sale and Purchase Agreement on Flats Unit (CSPA Flats Unit), therefore the Flats purchasers bear the consequences of bankruptcy on the developer. As a result of the bankruptcy of the Flats transaction raises legal issues related to the legal status of ownership of Flats Unit that  purchaser has paid the price. Do paid Flats Units become part of the bankruptcy estate of bankrupt developer? This paper aims to determine the impact of bankruptcy developer on flats’ purchasers and their legal status of the Flat Unit’s ownership  by  probing the case in Rusunami Kemanggisan Residences. This qualitative descriptive study, using research methods literature. Based on content analysis obtained the following conclusions. Bankruptcy resulted in a general seizure on properties of Flats developer, including Flats Unit which has been fully paid by the purchaser. The legal status of purchaser of  Flats Unit who has paid payment based CSPA Flats Unit,  not as owners, but as unsecured/concurrent creditors of the developer because it has not handed over the ownership of Flats Unit both factually and legally from the developer to the purchaser. As a result, the ownership rights of Flats Unit legally still on developer and become the developer’s bankruptcy assets. Suspension of Obligation for Payment of Debt  (PKPU) or mediation as an alternative dispute resolution is more favorable to developers and Flats purchaser.