Maulina Fakhrunnisa Salsanabila
Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

A comparative curriculum analysis from the perspective of data science Adi Susanto; Dian Endang Lestari; Maulina Fakhrunnisa Salsanabila
Inovasi Kurikulum Vol 21, No 1 (2024): Inovasi Kurikulum, February 2024
Publisher : Himpunan Pengembang Kurikulum Indonesia (HIPKIN)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.17509/jik.v21i1.66317

Abstract

The importance of data science in the mathematics curriculum at the elementary school level is to encourage data literacy from an early age and support the increasing demand for a data-literate society. This study aims to determine how and to what degree data science and related abilities are taught in Indonesian mathematics curricula, especially at the elementary school level. The research method used in this research is a qualitative research method with a literature study approach. Data was collected through documents obtained from the 2013 curriculum and Kurikulum Merdeka. The research results show that data material in the Kurikulum Merdeka has been given to students in phase A, or generally grades 1 and 2. However, in the 2013 curriculum, data material is given to grade 3 or phase B students. Moreover, the data material used in the Kurikulum Merdeka is explicitly related to data from many objects and data from measurements. In contrast, the 2013 curriculum relates to student data and their environment. Additionally, in representing data and material in the field of study, there are differences in the order between the curriculum of 2013 and the Kurikulum Merdeka. AbstrakPentingnya ilmu data dalam kurikulum matematika di tingkat sekolah dasar untuk mendorong literasi data sejak dini dan mendukung peningkatan permintaan masyarakat yang melek data. Penelitian ini memiliki tujuan untuk memahami bagaimana dan sejauh mana pengetahuan dan keterampilan data dipelajari dalam kurikulum matematika di Indonesia utamanya di tingkat sekolah dasar. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode penelitian kualitatif dengan pendekatan studi literatur. Data dikumpulkan melalui instrumen dokumen yang diperoleh dari dokumen yang berkaitan dengan kurikulum 2013 dan kurikulum merdeka. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa materi data dalam kurikulum merdeka sudah diberikan kepada siswa pada fase A atau umumnya kelas 1 dan 2, namun dalam kurikulum 2013 materi data baru diberikan kepada siswa pada kelas 3 atau setara dengan fase B. Selain itu, materi data yang digunakan dalam kurikulum merdeka secara eksplisit terkait dengan data dari banyak benda dan data hasil pengukuran, sedangkan dalam kurikulum 2013 terkait data diri peserta didik dan lingkungannya. Tidak hanya itu saja, dalam merepresentasikan data dan juga materi bidang kajian, terdapat perbedaan urutan dalam kurikulum 2013 dan kurikulum merdeka.Kata Kunci: Ilmu data; kurikulum Matematika; sekolah dasar; studi komparatif.
Mathematical Communication Ability Based on Anyaman Purun Ethnomathematics Maulina Fakhrunnisa Salsanabila; Marsigit Marsigit; Ali Mahmudi
AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan Vol 16, No 4 (2024): AL-ISHLAH: JURNAL PENDIDIKAN
Publisher : STAI Hubbulwathan Duri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35445/alishlah.v16i4.5666

Abstract

Mathematical communication skills are essential for students to effectively express and understand mathematical ideas. This study investigates these skills within the context of one-variable linear equations and inequalities, incorporating ethnomathematics through the lens of anyaman purun (traditional grass weaving) as a culturally relevant framework. A qualitative descriptive research design was employed. The participants included six grade 7 students selected purposively from a pool of 28 students. Data collection methods comprised tests, interviews, and documentation. Data analysis was conducted following Miles and Huberman’s model, which includes data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. Triangulation through test results and interviews was used to ensure data validity. Findings revealed that 46.4% of the students displayed high-level mathematical communication skills, 28.6% demonstrated moderate skills, and 25% exhibited low skills. Students with high proficiency effectively conveyed mathematical concepts using written, visual, and mathematical expressions, while those with moderate skills performed adequately in these areas. Students with lower skills faced challenges across all aspects of mathematical communication. The integration of anyaman purun within mathematics instruction highlighted cultural relevance as a tool for enhancing mathematical communication. High and moderate skill levels corresponded with more effective communication and understanding of mathematical concepts, whereas students with lower skill levels struggled with these aspects. The study suggests that incorporating culturally relevant contexts like anyaman purun can improve mathematical communication skills, potentially enhancing learning quality and fostering students' ability to articulate mathematical ideas.