Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Syir'ah Al-MIKRAJ: Jurnal studi Islam dan Humaniora Jurnal Hukum Inconcreto Tazkiyya: Jurnal Keislaman, Kemasyarakatan dan Kebudayaan
Abdul Basit
UIN Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
MUHAMMAD BIN ABDUL WAHHAB: PEMIKIRAN TEOLOGI DAN TANGGAPAN ULAMA MENGENAI PEMIKIRANNYA Abdul Basit
Tazkiya Vol 19 No 02 (2018): Juli-Desember 2018
Publisher : Pusat Kajian Islam dan Kemasyarakatan (PKIK), UIN Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab merupakan seorang tokoh pembaharu dalam bidang teologi Islam. Ia dilahirkan di tengah keluarga Ulama yang bila ditinjau dari sisi kedudukan, berasal dari keluarga terpandang, dan bila ditinjau dari sisi ekonomi juga bukan dari keluarga miskin. Pemikiran muhammad bin abdul wahhab di antaranya:berpegang kepada al quran dan sunnah sebagai sumber pertama syariat, memurnikan pemahaman tauhid dan menuntut orang muslimin untuk kembali seperti orang-orang muslim pada masa awal islam, berpegang teguh kepada manhaj salaf shaleh dan para imam mujtahid, meninggalkan fanatisme serta berdakwah untuk mengikuti kebenaran sesuai dalil, Membasmi bid`ah dan khurafat yang tersebar pada waktu itu karena kebodohan dan keterbelakangan. Adapun sikap para ulama dalam menanggapi pemikiran Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab terbagi kepada dua kelompok yaitu mendukung dan menolak. Diantara para ulama yang mendukung pemikiran Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab adalah Syekh Muhammad Al Gazali, Syekh Muhammad Rasyid Ridho dan Sejarawan al- Jabarti. Diantara para ulama yang menolak pemikiran Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab adalah Syeikh Sulaiman bin Abdul Wahhab, Syeikh Ahmad bin Dahlan al-Makki al-Syafi'i dan Syeikh Muhammad al-Kurdi.
Perlindungan Anak dari Grooming Seksual Dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Positif: Kajian Yuridis-Normatif Komparatif Abdul Basit; Ridwan Bahrudin; Muhamad Noval Arahman
AL-MIKRAJ Jurnal Studi Islam dan Humaniora (E-ISSN 2745-4584) Vol. 6 No. 1: AL-Mikraj Jurnal Studi Islam dan Humaniora
Publisher : Pascasarjana Institut Agama Islam Sunan Giri Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37680/almikraj.v6i1.8478

Abstract

Child sexual grooming has become an alarming form of violence in the digital era, as offenders exploit online media to approach, manipulate, and exploit children. This article aims to analyze child sexual grooming from the perspectives of positive law and Islamic law. The study employs a normative juridical method with a qualitative approach, conducted through library research with descriptive-analytical and comparative analysis. The findings reveal that Indonesian positive law, particularly the Child Protection Law and the Sexual Violence Crime Law, criminalizes grooming, yet legal gaps remain, especially in addressing digital-based crimes. In Islamic law, grooming is classified as jarīmah and jināyah because it violates the principles of maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah, which emphasize the protection of religion, life, intellect, honor, and property. The comparative analysis demonstrates that integrating Islamic legal values with positive law could strengthen child protection mechanisms and provide a more comprehensive normative foundation. Therefore, enhancing regulations through the synergy of both legal systems is crucial in preventing and addressing cases of child sexual grooming.
Legal Certainty in Housing Development on Protected Rice Paddy Land: A Case Study of the Pendawa Housing Estate, Lebaksiu, Tegal Regency Muhamad Noval Arahman; Abdul Basit; Iin Ratna Sumirat
Jurnal Hukum In Concreto Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Hukum In Concreto Volume 5 Nomor 1 2026
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Harapan Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35960/inconcreto.v5i1.2124

Abstract

The designation of Protected Rice Paddy Land (LSD) is a national policy aimed at controlling the conversion of agricultural land to ensure long-term food security. In practice, however, this policy often conflicts with factual conditions on the ground, particularly when residential housing projects have already been constructed and sold before the spatial utilization permits were fully obtained. This study aims to analyze the legal certainty of housing developments built on land that was later designated as LSD, and to identify appropriate legal protection mechanisms for good-faith purchasers. The Pendawa Housing Estate in Tegal Regency is used as a case study, and the research applies a normative juridical method based on statutory and case approaches. The findings reveal that LSD serves as an administrative instrument within the spatial planning system and should not be treated as an absolute prohibition on land use. Its implementation must be proportional and respect the principles of legal certainty and fairness, particularly concerning buyers who have acquired property lawfully. Legal responsibility for spatial violations lies with the developer, while local governments play a strategic role in resolving these issues through adaptive and equitable administrative law mechanisms. This study concludes that harmonization between LSD policies and regional spatial planning systems is essential, alongside the protection of good-faith stakeholders' rights in the context of residential development.
Sharia Regional Regulation and Hierarchical Legal Pluralism: Non-Coercive Governance of Baduy Customary Law in Indonesia Iin Ratna Sumirat; Abdul Basit; Atu Karomah; Hajah Nurzakiah Binti Haji Ramlee
Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Syir'ah Vol 24, No 1 (2026)
Publisher : IAIN Manado

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30984/jis.v24i1.4116

Abstract

Since decentralization, sharia-inspired local regulations have proliferated in Indonesia, yet scholarship often narrowly focuses on coercive enforcement and social conflict. Consequently, there is limited understanding of how these regulations function symbolically in normatively plural settings, especially among communities that are not their direct targets. This study employs a qualitative socio-legal approach to examine the positioning of sharia-inspired local regulations in relation to the Baduy indigenous community of Kanekes, Banten. The analysis is based on official documents, specifically three regional regulations: Banten Provincial Regulation No. 1 of 2021 on Halal Product Guarantee, Lebak Regional Regulation No. 8 of 2001 on the Protection of the Baduy Community, and Lebak Regional Regulation No. 6 of 2003 on the Prohibition of Alcoholic Beverages, as well as Constitutional Court Decision No. 97/PUU-XIV/2016 on the Recognition of Indigenous Faith Followers as a broader legal reference point. Findings reveal that these regulations do not operate through direct enforcement against the Baduy, but through the construction of normative hierarchies within the public legal sphere. For instance, halal-certified frameworks in buffer zones reorder sources of normativity, elevating state-institutionalized sharia norms while repositioning pikukuh (customary law) within a framework of conditional recognition. This article argues that the core issue of sharia formalization lies in how public law symbolically constructs these hierarchies. Its contribution lies in advancing a non-coercive approach to legal pluralism and clarifying the ethical limits of sharia formalization in systems that claim to respect normative diversity.
Co-Authors Atu Karomah Hajah Nurzakiah Binti Haji Ramlee Iin Ratna Sumirat Muhamad Noval Arahman Ridwan Bahrudin